Make this my home page
More buttons
Best of the Day
Page
XKCD - a webcomic of romance, sarcasm, math and language
Video

Show Me Your Genitals

Blog
BME ModBlog - Tattoos, piercing, scarification and body modification
Game
MySims Kingdom
Art

Katie West - Model Self Portraits

Cool tools
Hot links
Don't discount journalism
Novelist and comic book legend's homepage
Searchable history of the internet
Exposing systematic torture in Iran
Museum of science fiction, utopia and extraordinary journeys
The real story of christianity
Image bookmarking
Developing tech to get the internet to its full potential
Free Culture, Open Government, Liberty
Online Buddhist meditation
Reducing harm from drug use
The community is the brand
Dissecting the {Subset} Culture
Catching a lift to the heavens
A comprehensive look at the Iraq war

Search Results

37 found

YouTube comedy video blogger Mark Day on God, lesbians and the California Supreme Court... you know, the usual.

 . . read more

There is no doubt at all that the benefits to society of the fall in crime as a result of drug legalisation would be dramatic. The argument always put forward against this is that there would be a commensurate increase in drug use as a result of legalisation. This, it seems to me, is a bogus point: tobacco is a legal drug, whose use is declining, and precisely because it is legal, its users are far more amenable to Government control, education programmes and taxation than they would be otherwise. Studies suggest that the market is already almost saturated, and anyone who wishes to purchase the drug of their choice anywhere can already do so. The idea that many people are holding back solely because of a law which they know is already unenforceable is ridiculous.

Ultimately, people will make choices which harm themselves, whether they involve diet, smoking, drinking, lack of exercise, sexual activity or pursuit of extreme sports. In all these instances, the Government rightly takes the line that if these activities are to be pursued, society will ensure that those who pursue them have access to accurate information about the risks; can access assistance to change their harmful habits should they so wish; are protected by a legal standards regime; are taxed accordingly; and – crucially – do not harm other people. Only in the field of drugs does the Government take a different line.

The case is overwhelming. But I fear that policy will not catch up with the facts any time soon. It would take a mature society to accept that some individuals may hurt, or even kill themselves, as a result of a policy change, even if the evidence suggested that fewer people died or were harmed as a result. It would take a brave government to face down the tabloid fury in the face of anecdotes about middle-class children who bought drugs legally and came to grief. [More]

Julian Critchley was the former director of the UK Anti-Drug Co-Ordination Unit.

 . . read more
In Islam, Allah is the ultimate authority. In democracy, authority ultimately lies with the people. But does this mean that Islam is incompatible with democracy? Middle East Forum Director Daniel Pipes criticizes the role of Sharia Law, identifying this concept as one of the greatest obstacles to democratic reforms in Muslim societies. . . read more
It's been a week now since e-bikes were made illegal by the NSW Supreme Court and there has been no word, no contact from the Federal Environment Minister Peter Garrett (or from Penny Wong, or the NSW Govt) to the people caught up in this mess - Deborah Matheson who was originally convicted and Trevor Patrick whose business has been destroyed.

The simple point again is the environment needs as many people as possible to change from car use as soon as possible and that's what e-bikes (electric assisted bikes) are helping. The immediate reduction of CO2 creation is a Federal issue and past members of Federal Parliament have acted as human beings even if their party wants them to shut up. This issue will be taken to the Court of Appeal and Garrett, being a lawyer, could play his part in the legal team. Do I hear his people saying ‘he can't do that'? Yes, he can if he cares about things that matter. Does he? His office could have responded to the detailed submission that Trevor Patrick has sent them or at least ring him but they haven't.

In California the right wing Republican Governor is actually subsidizing the sale of e-bikes while here in Australia Labor governments are letting them be pushed off the road. The environment should be more important than the Supreme Court.

 . . read more
A Moblogic video blog on a little reported aspect of the USA's war on terror and associated law enforcement. What happens when the FBI funds domestic terrorism? . . read more
Stephen Murdoch, author of IQ: A Smart History of a Failed Idea, discusses the impacts of IQ testing on sentencing for convicted murder Daryl Atkins, and describes how IQ test results can change over time. . . read more
Reinvestigating the assassination of Robert F Kennedy . . read more
Legal Analyst Jeffrey Toobin examines ongoing efforts to "conservatize" the U.S. Supreme Court - which awarded the presidency to George W Bush over Al Gore in 2000 - starting with judicial appointments made by the Reagan Administration. . . read more
Washington DC's gun ownership laws face a major legal challenge, with firearms advocates going to the Supreme Court to try to overturn a 32-year-old law that restricts access to handguns. If they are successful, it could pave the way for similar cases.  . . read more
Suspected terrorists, held long-term in Guantanamo Bay, are about to be tried by special U.S. military tribunals. Michael Ratner from the Center for Constitutional Rights believes that what's at stake is the future of justice in the USA. . . read more
1234
   
Next
From Coldplay to Leonardo diCaprio to Al Gore, influential environmentalists are increasingly modeling green behavior by neutralizing their carbon emissions through carbon offsets. Offsets are based on the notion that consumers can balance out carbon intensive activities, like travel, by contributing to projects that reduce greenhouse gases... But just as buying indulgences in the Middle Ages never really erased your sins, carbon offsets rarely counteract your carbon use...

For over a decade, governments and non-profit foundations in the developed world have been offering large sums of money to developing countries in exchange for tree plantations, also known as “carbon sinks”. However scientists point out that there is a major difference between the kind of carbon emitted from the burning of fossil fuels and the kind of carbon stored by trees... Once out of the ground and into the air via cars, coal extraction, etc., fossil carbon joins the active carbon pool. It will not return to the fossil carbon pool for millennia. So, the carbon absorbed by trees does not zero out the carbon emitted by airplanes... Even if the carbon were equivalent, trees are not necessarily reliable carbon storehouses... when trees burn, rot, or are chopped down, they release any carbon they have stored...

Frequently, carbon sinks displace local populations, generating poverty, inequality, and food and water scarcity. They also drastically reduce biological diversity. In turn, the erosion of resources at every level exacerbates local conflicts. Even more seriously, some carbon offset tree plantations have become an excuse for human rights violations. [More]

Find out about our Widget

Feedback

10 aug

The HomepageDAILY community likes to co-create both content and process. What are you thinking right now about what we do and how we do it? Tell us about the news, videos and stories and anything else you see on HPD. What you like, what you don't like, what you'd like to see in future. Recommend a website, video or article; send us pix, new stories - share it with us and by so doing you are giving us permission to share it with the world.

Leave Feedback here

            *********************************

Re: Take Your God and Shove Him

Thank you Pat Condell, you are a secular saint. My son does not attend the religion lesson at school and was told by one of the volunteers who come in to warp the kids' minds that she was "praying for him". I want to play her, and all those other interfering busybodies, this video. In fact it's so good I think I will transcribe it and pass the text around. My favourite bit is the end: I'm not interested, I've heard it all before and I think it's all lies - insulting, degrading nonsense that contaminates everything it touches. Whenever I'm exposed to religion I feel dirty, I feel contaminated by the mealy-mouthed platitudes that pass as wisdom, the naked money-grubbing, the controlling rhetoric devoid of any humanity or compassion, the supercilious hectoring tone, the constant intrusive demands for privilege and the absolutely unforgivable violation of the minds of young children. Amen - Michelle

            *********************************

Re: Experts Agree: Legalize Drugs - From Julian Critchley

Amen Julian Critchley. Legalize all drugs. People should have access to any molecule or compound they want. Gate Keepers for Big Pharma are costing end users a fortune. Retiring Police seniors inevitably say Legalization is the only way to take the money out of the criminal economy. Safe access through guaranteed qaulity control reduces street overdose/HIV infection. People have to have access to safe drugs on demand.

Personally I think the Olympics should be used for drug testing. The money sqaundered on the "games" and all the infrastructure around them would be better utilised in research and development. The bullshit about winners by one hundredth of a second is past a joke. Crowd control and propaganda for political posers and Patriotism "the last refuge of scoundrels". It's a farce - the athletes who do not want be used as lab rats should have drug free games which would be like the Para Olympics where the entrants display raw courage and drive with next to no support from the Public purse... Like Euthanasia, a doctor of your choice should be able to give you a legal release and advise you the best they know how about what drugs/course you wish to take. We are destroying doctors who really want to help individuals run their own lives with legal bullying by moralistic parasites who are terrified of the idea that they and all of us are responsible for our own lives - Anthony Innes

            *********************************

Re: Is Australian General Jim Molan a War Criminal?

Thanks Gerry, I did click on the link you recommended to "find the dogs" and then I threw up. Jim Molan a war crim? Generals can't help themselves. Molan bombed hospitals, Georgia bombed hospitals in Osettia. The U.S. military hasn't even faced up to its criminal obliteration of Nagasaki. War crimes are what the baddies do - it's never us - Sherbert

            *********************************

Re: Washington Comes to Mr Smith

Condi, is yet another of those on my list to post a poop to, with a note attached stating, "Take a look at yourself!" Cranky soul that I am - Dean

            *********************************

Re: Scary Mary

Love it. I have always found Julie Andrews quite frightening - Sue

9 jul
12 jun
More feedback...
© 2007 homePageDAILY - All rights reserved * Terms of Use * Privacy Policy * Advertising Information * Media Kit * Contact Us