Make this my home page
More buttons
Best of the Day
Page
Turn off that Wi-Fi network - it's disturbing our chakras.
Video

Hot For Words: Lollipop

Blog
Innocent Spam
Game
EA SPORTS Complex on PlayStation Home
Art
Kinetic sculpture is a cross between art and engineering.
Cool tools
Hot links
Dadaist deconstruction of new media, as a flash game.
Everything you need to know about microscopic water bears
News for nerds
For lovers of the Green Fairy
Stories and art from Australia's Yolgnu people
Australia's best science fiction author
Did the earth just move?
Don't discount journalism
Novelist and comic book legend's homepage
Searchable history of the internet
Exposing systematic torture in Iran
Museum of science fiction, utopia and extraordinary journeys
The real story of christianity
Image bookmarking
Developing tech to get the internet to its full potential
George Bush Is A Traitor

David Obst believes George Bush is a traitor trying to destroy the USA.

Journalist and author DAVID OBST was in the thick of political scandal in the 1970s, helping break the story of the My Lai massacre in Vietnam and brokering the Watergate book deal for Woodward and Bernstein. After months of painstaking investigation, he has come to the conclusion that US President George W. Bush is an Al Qaeda agent trying to destroy the country.

The evidence is overwhelming. Prior to Osama bin Laden's diabolically clever plan to install Bush as our nation's chief executive, the United States had never been stronger. We had a vast budget surplus, we were respected and admired by most of the people in the world that mattered, we had a military machine that knew it could wipe out all the other armies in the world combined, and we Americans were sure that the momentum of history was on our side.

Then came George Bush. In quick succession we had a series of seemingly disparate events that has resulted in America being in real danger of going into a historical decline from which it may never recover. Our country is now carrying a budget deficit that saddles our children and grandchildren with economic cement boots. The world has stopped liking us, and in many cases now hates us. At this year's Miss Universe contest they booed Miss USA.

Our army and National Guard units are not just stretched thin, they are broken. Even worse, we have lost our moral authority as a super power. We're the guys who act like Nazis, except that we really don't. We get publicity for doing horrific things to our prisoners, but the enemy knows that, unlike the Nazis, we'll never inflict state-run carnage on a civilian population. We don't go into towns that support terrorists and drag all the adult males into the town square and shoot them. They know we can't do that and so they use a hundred dollar IED to destroy a million dollar tank, and they have systematically killed more Americans over there than were lost at the World Trade Center.

Coincidence that all of this has happened on George Bush's watch? Perhaps...but what if? We know that the Bush's and the Ben Laden's hung with the same crowd when George and Osama were kids. I'm just speculating here, but what if the two boys met on some joint family vacation and vowed to be pals to the end, to be true to each other no matter what? To become "life-buddies"?

How else do we explain George Bush and the combined might of the most sophisticated army in history not capturing Osama? How are we to understand why, when we had Osama and the Al Qaeda leadership trapped in the hills of Afghanistan we didn't finish him off? How are we to make sense of the fact that a country that has the technology to find specific rocks on the surface of Mars can't find the most wanted man on this planet?

coffinsAnd then there is the cost. The war has resulted in countless casualties. I say countless because the Bush government has done an amazing job of not allowing the media to keep score and report to the American public the human cost of this war. In five years of conflict not one American soldier has died on camera. Not one American soldier has been shown coming home in his or her coffin. Only recently have we begun to see the human garbage heaps our Veterans Centers were allowed to become. And finally, what will be the long-term cost to the minds of the hundreds of thousands of young Americans who ordered to serve in Mesopotamia?

George Bush has also cost us the best Army ever assembled in human history. Why else, if not working for Al Qaeda, would he allow America's strongest deterrent against terrorism be reduced to an undermanned, demoralized, defeated shell of its former self? And the cost in treasure? Over eight hundred billion dollars gone. Money that could have bought us energy independence. Money that could have begun to solve our emerging health crisis. Money that could have upgraded and improved the physical infrastructure of our roads, our cities, our farms. Money that could have made the United States educationally competitive with the rest of the world. Gone, close to a trillion dollars, and what do we have to show for it? Nothing but staggering deficit, a weakened, under funded military and all of the domestic problems we haven't solved still needing our economic attention.

The list of other brilliant moves to weaken our country that George Bush has pulled off is extensive. He has wiped out our Intelligence agencies by replacing competent life-long officers with political hacks. There are over a thousand unfilled job openings at the State Department because no bright kids wants to go work there. He has turned the Justice department into a joke; a place where Harvard Law School graduates are out numbered by Pat Robertson Law School graduates fifty-to-one.

Satan himself could have written George Bush's environmental policy. His no child left behind educational policy seems to have left most kids competent to take standardized tests but not learn a damn thing. He has cut billions of dollars from our urban police forces resulting in a dramatic spike in violent crimes in all of our major cites. And, most clever of all, he staffed the highest level of every executive branch with incompetent, shortsighted, irresponsible, political ideologues who managed to spend hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars in ways to insure the least public good.

Finally, there is the wonderful job the President has done for Al Qaeda on the war on terror. The Bush plan of sending hundreds of thousands armed Americans into the Middle East has had the predicable result: Each day, throughout the region, Arab television shows brutal, mind-searing images of large, heavily armed Americans killing men, women and children who look just like the viewing audience. A whole generation of Arab men have been radicalized and made into armed warriors.

Where, before the Bush presidency, we'd had crazed fringe groups plotting the destruction of our way of life, we now have a coherently organized terrorist militia armed and willing to fight us to the death. Bush and his policies have created the greatest recruitment tool Osama ever could have hoped for. He has turned the war on terror into a fight that we are now actually losing. Membership in terrorist organizations has never been higher. The number of terrorist attacks is at all time peaks. In short, the actions of George W's presidency has allowed Osama to realize a terrorist wet dream.

It is said that democracies get the leaders they deserve, but years from now, when presidential historians look back at the early part of the 21st century, they will realize that our greatest enemy must have put a puppet in charge of our country and these historians will come to the sad realization that no country ever deserved to be ruled by George W. Bush.

Related video: Treasonable Doubt

Go back to previous pageLeave some feedbackPrint this pageEmail link to friendsBookmark in del.icio.usAdd to Stumble ThisAdd to your favourite bookmarksDigg this article

Tags

 

Related Stories

   
Next

So, I read today that the designer of Mattel's Barbie doll was obsessed with sex. Seriously? We need a book-length study to tell us that?

We in the land of feminist academics have been teaching the pernicious sexual politics of Barbie for years. The breasts that defy gravity, the hair, the long, long legs and of course the cruel, nipped in waist. Oh, don't forget the tiny clothes, the f*ck-me pumps, not to mention the well-equipped kitchens in every Barbie Dream House. The message of Barbie seems unambiguous to me.

Still, many students (and not a few colleagues) consistently resist seeing Barbie as a miniature sex toy, claiming instead that the doll was a good role model for little girls. (One could, after all, purchase a Barbie doll dressed as a doctor.) Or claiming, equally untenably, that toys had no impact on their ideas about gender roles or their own sexuality.

These students, mostly women, want to rescue Barbie, to protect their own childhoods from academic interrogations of pop culture and what those interrogations might reveal. That's understandable. Yet, many of these same students sit in my class pouring out of tank tops, squeezed into low-rise jeans, or tugging on mini-skirts so short they are nearly impossible to sit down in. That is, dressed like Barbie.

It's an experience I regularly have as a feminist critic of popular culture: a media event, book or news story demonstrates that I'm not wrong, my ideology is not based in "over analyzing," "hyper sensitivity," or "reading too much into things" (the three most common criticisms feminists tend to encounter). It's disappointing, frankly, to stumble so often upon evidence of society's sexism and to keep having to explain that it's there. Disappointing that Barbie was so obviously a sexed-up, misogynist, bad idea for little girls and to realize how thoroughly our culture embraced the toy anyway.

So, here we are again. Feminists were right: no one but a sex-obsessed man with a perverse idea of female anatomy would create a female toy like Barbie. And, as is too too often the case for feminists, being right isn't something to celebrate.

Dr. Bean is an Associate Professor of English at Marshall University, specializing in Gender Studies, Film and Drama. She is the author of "Post-Backlash Feminism: Women and the Media Since Reagan/Bush" (McFarland & Co. 2007). She hosts a blog on mid-life and feminism at kelliebean.com.