Oil Addiction and Identity
The end of Textbooks
Things which don't go away
Ace Combat: Joint Assault
Sitting Room Teaser
Give Peace a Chance
24 Hour News: A Lesson in the Unimportant- by Sean Maguire

Throughout history the pace at which we've received news has gotten exponentially quicker- a tecnhological dynamism which has almost always been for good.

Not anymore.

With the 24 hour news-cycle the unimportant, and the uninteresting are given equal airtime with truly monumental moments; leaving the viewer with the almost impossible task of differentiating the two.

Rudd picks his ear, Turnbull leaves politics, another earthquake, another genocide- little by little our critical faculties erode until death destruction and destitution are put on an equal footing of with another politician's indescretions.  

Today, as we reported, another example of the U.S. military's thuggery and murder came to light- hopefully resulting in a mass review of the sacrosanct rules of engagement and some serious self-reflection on the part of the U.S military generally.

The fact is that today's blood stained news will become tomorrow's blood stained fish and chip paper, with little change or regard for the state of apathy we're slipping into.

Kind of makes you wistful for the days when you'd only get news once every 6 months from a ship.

 


Comments

Please log in to leave a comment.
You need to have been a member for 24 hours and validated your email before leaving a comment.
 
How to Produce International News on a Shoestring Budget
10 mar  |  Kira Kay, co-founder of The Bureau for International Reporting, explains how her non-profit is able to produce quality journalism from around the globe on a shoestring budget. "International news does not have to cost a lot of money," she says. "We all have the technology now to do it." . . read more
The death and life of journalism: John Nichols
26 aug  |  The death and life of journalism: John Nichols . . read more
Should Drugs Be Legal? - From Alan Jones
28 nov  |  Should illegality of drugs be removed to bring them under greater control by society? If something is no longer illegal, it can be "regulated" by government. A legal regulated alcohol industry means the alcohol content of booze is regulated and stated on the label. And make no mistake, it's a drug.

Much of the hype about drugs ignores the fact that they're dangerous because for all we know, 50% or more of what is sold as ecstasy may be rat poison or something equally toxic. How do you legislate to stop people doing what they want to do? Many people want to take substances, including alcohol, that alter their mood or consciousness. Most people are able to do it without causing themselves or others excessive harm. It could be argued that the likelihood of harm would be reduced even further by a regulated industry which restricts supply, provides warnings to consumers and monitors the content of what is sold.

There will be always people who could be described as having addictive personalities. But it could be argued that their addictions may have more to do with their personalities than with the substance they take. Can it be argued that if drugs were regulated it would be more difficult for addicts to acquire large quantities of them? There would be warnings about their use or misuse. Sale could be restricted. Content and quality would meet certain standards...

It's time to debate whether all we've done in the past has progressed the issue at all. If the situation is not improving, and it appears it's not, we might have to think of other strategies. I simply don't know. But I think the arguments are worth ventilating. . . read more

Belgium Unveils the Burqa- by Sean Maguire
1 apr  |  It has been said by many that the one irreconcilable difference between the West and Islam is in attitudes towards to women.

With Belgium's decision to ban the wearing of the burqa and the face-veiling niqab in public, this polarisation is gaining legal force and public support.

So with the inevitable debate over the merits of this decision there is one question I'd like to ask to supporters of the niqab; supporters who argue that this is a woman's choice, that it shows modesty and that it protects the individual's personality because the person is judged on what they say rather than what they look like:

How many women have you seen dressed in niqab in your office building, serving you in shops, driving buses, studying in university, walking alone down the street, out at night, playing sport, driving a car, watching a movie, going to the opera... etc ?

The niqab is a cloth penitentiary and the world will be a much better place when we turn on the t.v. and see women run through the streets screaming "burn your burqas"

  . . read more

The Spirit of Christmas- by Sumer Dayal
28 dec  |  It seems that the flavour of Christmas in 2009 is to attack prominent world leaders. First Berlusconi and now the Pope. Both attackers have been labeled mentally ill. I admit you would have to be a little crazy to hurt the Pope – Berlusconi, not so much.

Thankfully, the Catholic Church is a very forgiving and understanding institution, especially under Pope Benedict XVI. The Vatican released a statement saying that they were likely to be “very lenient” and that Susanna Maiolo (the now hospitalised attacker) will be forgiven.

This followed the Pope’s Christmas message of tolerance, where he told 100,000 people to condemn abortion – again.

So I guess breaching security, crash tackling and almost decapitating an 82-year-old Pope, as well as breaking the hip of the unfortunate 87-year-old French Cardinal Roger Etchegaray, is really a pittance in front of the forgiveness and welcoming embrace of the Catholic Church.

Just don’t mention abortion.  . . read more

It's Not My Life- by Sean Maguire
27 nov  |  On Tuesday I was riding a motorcycle to work when I was hit by a bus. The bus was travelling quickly when it hit, causing the bike to be flung from underneath me- skidding to a halt a few metres away.

Seconds afterwards I sat up, in a daze, surrounded by metal, glass and petrol.

I should have been dead, but miraculously I walked away, only suffering a slightly sprained ankle.

The mental affect though has been a little more dramatic.

I keep replaying the images of the crash over and over again.

I keep seeing the look on my dad's face when I first saw him afterwards; I keep hearing my mum's voice when I talked to her, and I keep hearing the smashing screeching sounds of metal hitting metal.

All this has led to me to realise that the idea that my life, is my life alone, is ridiculous.

My life is part-owned by everybody that loves me- my family and friends, meaning that they all have a stake in it, and they all would be affected if I threw it away on something as stupid as riding a motorbike.

For most people this won't be revelatory.

But for me this crash has been life-changing.

It's shown me that the worst can happen to me,  that my shield of invincibility is breakable and that if I don't think about those around me before I act, I mightn't get to see them again.  

 . . read more
Augmented (Hyper)Reality: Domestic Robocop
28 jan  |  The latter half of the 20th century saw the built environment merged with media space, and architecture taking on new roles related to branding, image and consumerism. Augmented reality may recontextualise the functions of consumerism and architecture, and change in the way in which we operate within it.  . . read more
Rudd's Security Scare Shows Australia Cares- by Sean Maguire
5 dec  |  You can be excused for having missed this one...

...Kevin Rudd, the guest of honour at the launch of ABC 3 was the victim of a security scare from an unnamed contracted cleaner.

The story gets stranger as the AFP, the cleaning company and the ABC itself all refused to comment on what had happened.

It might not be a fair comparison but this 'incident' did make me think of the media world's reaction to Tareq and Michaele Sahali's White House invasion last week.

The couple got scorned and ridiculed from all corners and the Secret Service was forced to make an embarrasing apology for this uncharacteristic slip up.

Here though, Rudd's 'dance with death' has only been run on the 7pm ABC news (it didn't even make it to ABC online) and it looks like that will be it from here on in.

There hasn't been any mention of what risk Rudd had been placed in or what will be done differently to avoid similar breaches.

Why the difference if both breaches were equally harmless?

In my mind it shows that the media knows that Rudd's security isn't exactly going set the water-cooler ablaze, and that Rudd himself probably realises that to talk about it or investigate it further would look weak to a country that still prides itself on its stiff upper lip.

Kind of comforting that in Australia, the politicians ain't too precious.

 

  . . read more

She Who Must Be Obeid from The Outsider
4 dec  |  Kristina Keneally is the new Premier of NSW. With the second shameful episode in Australian politics this week, we now have ample evidence that the apparatchiks of left and right political parties are so far removed from the citizenry they profess to serve that they have disappeared from sight.

Long knives and short memories seem to be the go. Add to that a complete disregard for the empowerment of community by social networks, mobile technology and the culture of the ‘local' and you have the recipe for the demise of parliamentary democracy.

Not that we will be sorry to see it go. What is interesting, however, is when and what will replace the two-party system and the party machines.

AS a first step look out for the proliferation of political parties in the next Australian elections as voters embrace pluralism in a stand against the Obeid's and Tripodi's of this world.

  . . read more

blogs   100words
 
by Jack Freeman

As four months of travel in India is coming to an end I am finding
it continually confusing that many of the cultural atrocities that
come with this society of 1 billion strong are deemed "interesting"
and "profound".

Sitting in social circles from hostel to hostel, I have met forceful disagreement with my criticisms of the oppressive nature of India's cast system and their large Islamic community. The smug, "oh, you just don't get it" attitude you receive for owning such opinions is both condescending and misguided.

This is an enraging example of the pseudo, naive belief that this "exotic"society is unintelligible to (most of) us westerners. In this beautiful, richly diverse and all round fun country where, by the same token, you will be greeted by zero empathy of female lib, homosexual equality or my own personal faithlessness, I wish that travelers would not deny their education and morals on arrival. Is it not possible to balance both romance and a sense of rationality?