Make this my home page
More buttons
Best of the Day
Page
Turn off that Wi-Fi network - it's disturbing our chakras.
Video

Hot For Words: Lollipop

Blog
Innocent Spam
Game
EA SPORTS Complex on PlayStation Home
Art
Kinetic sculpture is a cross between art and engineering.
Cool tools
Hot links
Dadaist deconstruction of new media, as a flash game.
Everything you need to know about microscopic water bears
News for nerds
For lovers of the Green Fairy
Stories and art from Australia's Yolgnu people
Australia's best science fiction author
Did the earth just move?
Don't discount journalism
Novelist and comic book legend's homepage
Searchable history of the internet
Exposing systematic torture in Iran
Museum of science fiction, utopia and extraordinary journeys
The real story of christianity
Image bookmarking
Developing tech to get the internet to its full potential
London's Logo No Go

The long awaited London Olympic symbol for the 2012 Games has been unveiled in the English capital and it's gone down... well... terribly. In fact, you could even say it made several people sick.

Amid much fanfare the logo that will propel London towards the highly hyped event has been revealed. Complaints rained in that it was ugly, impractical, reminiscent of a multi-coloured swastika... and worst of all: segments of its animation caused sufferers of epilepsy to have fits. Our still picture is, of course, totally safe!

If you look really carefully, you can clearly(?) see that the scrawl is in fact the number 2012 all higgledy piggledy... clever huh? The Epilepsy charity, Epilepsy Action, received several calls from photosensitive sufferers complaining that they had watched an animated segment on the London Olympic bid website which had led to them having fits. The offending section of the site has since been removed.

The really bad news is that we have to now see this eyesore plastered everywhere for the next 5 years until the 2012 Games actually start. For more info, clicking View the Page link below will take you straight to the money consuming exercise (in an amateur sporting event) that is the London 2012 Website.

View the pageGo back to previous pageLeave some feedbackPrint this pageEmail link to friendsBookmark in del.icio.usAdd to Stumble ThisAdd to your favourite bookmarksDigg this article

Tags

 

Related Stories

   
Next

So, I read today that the designer of Mattel's Barbie doll was obsessed with sex. Seriously? We need a book-length study to tell us that?

We in the land of feminist academics have been teaching the pernicious sexual politics of Barbie for years. The breasts that defy gravity, the hair, the long, long legs and of course the cruel, nipped in waist. Oh, don't forget the tiny clothes, the f*ck-me pumps, not to mention the well-equipped kitchens in every Barbie Dream House. The message of Barbie seems unambiguous to me.

Still, many students (and not a few colleagues) consistently resist seeing Barbie as a miniature sex toy, claiming instead that the doll was a good role model for little girls. (One could, after all, purchase a Barbie doll dressed as a doctor.) Or claiming, equally untenably, that toys had no impact on their ideas about gender roles or their own sexuality.

These students, mostly women, want to rescue Barbie, to protect their own childhoods from academic interrogations of pop culture and what those interrogations might reveal. That's understandable. Yet, many of these same students sit in my class pouring out of tank tops, squeezed into low-rise jeans, or tugging on mini-skirts so short they are nearly impossible to sit down in. That is, dressed like Barbie.

It's an experience I regularly have as a feminist critic of popular culture: a media event, book or news story demonstrates that I'm not wrong, my ideology is not based in "over analyzing," "hyper sensitivity," or "reading too much into things" (the three most common criticisms feminists tend to encounter). It's disappointing, frankly, to stumble so often upon evidence of society's sexism and to keep having to explain that it's there. Disappointing that Barbie was so obviously a sexed-up, misogynist, bad idea for little girls and to realize how thoroughly our culture embraced the toy anyway.

So, here we are again. Feminists were right: no one but a sex-obsessed man with a perverse idea of female anatomy would create a female toy like Barbie. And, as is too too often the case for feminists, being right isn't something to celebrate.

Dr. Bean is an Associate Professor of English at Marshall University, specializing in Gender Studies, Film and Drama. She is the author of "Post-Backlash Feminism: Women and the Media Since Reagan/Bush" (McFarland & Co. 2007). She hosts a blog on mid-life and feminism at kelliebean.com.
Find out about our Widget

Feedback

18 dec

The HomepageDAILY community likes to co-create both content and process. What are you thinking right now about what we do and how we do it? Tell us about the news, videos and stories and anything else you see on HPD. What you like, what you don't like, what you'd like to see in future. Recommend a website, video or article; send us pix, new stories - share it with us and by so doing you are giving us permission to share it with the world.

Leave Feedback here

             ********************************* 

Re: The Dead Piled on Top of Each Other By Sami Abdel-Shafi in Gaza City

I think it's sad... The leaders of the 2 nations should think of the innocent people that they are killing. The war that is going on should be a boxing match between the two leaders, shouldnt have to kill innocent children for other peoples mistakes. I say, "Peace to 2 great nations Ps: think of others then yourself" God Bless - Pati

             ********************************* 

Thanks for featuring our "100 Movie Spoilers" video

Hey Homepage Daily, Wanted to thank you for featuring our "100 Movie Spoilers" video! Wanted to let you know that we're going to be releasing another spoiler video around Oscar season and we actually just released a trailer for the second season of our popular LOST parody series (first five episodes from first season was viewed over 4 million times). Check it out.

Thanks again and we'll be in touch! Benny & Rafi Fine The Fine Brothers

             ********************************* 

Re: Pope against homosexuals

The pope is such a cunt; we must stand up against him and the thousands of child abusers on his payroll - Gerald Glover

 &n