Oil Addiction and Identity
The end of Textbooks
Things which don't go away
Ace Combat: Joint Assault
Sitting Room Teaser
Give Peace a Chance
Agriculture out of the ETS but who will suffer?- by Sean Maguire

For worried farmers, Rudd's announcement that agriculture would permanently be outside the ETS must have brought some relief. The announcement was also sweetened when the possibility was raised that farmers may be able to buy carbon credits with good land management and a reduction of carbon emissions.


For me this policy seems sensible.

I was told a story as a kid of the life of a friend who was a wheat farmer; I was told how he constantly had to take into account when or how heavy it would rain- if it rained at a certian time during harvest it would mean a bumper crop, a week later and the season was ruined.

That knife edge life that city slickers can scarcely imagine was also coupled with an amazing resourcefulness he showed daily in builiding tools and constantly thinking up new ways to farm smarter. 

It hardly seems fair to make such a back-breaking and nerve destroying job any harder.

However, the bottom line remains: if the full effects of climate change occur then they will cause worse droughts and more wild el niño weather patterns- all disasters that will be most prominently be felt by the farmers.

The fact is that even though farmers are so georgraphically isolated and so often ridiculed as bumpkins they are still connected to the outside world and they could be part of the solution to its greatest threat.

And for us city folk, we'll have to be prepared to dig a little deeper and stop complaining about high food prices otherwise we mightn't stay so safe, fat and happy

Comments

Please log in to leave a comment.
You need to have been a member for 24 hours and validated your email before leaving a comment.
 
CPRS - Why your contributions don't count
29 nov  |  On the day when the 'crucial' CPRS goes to the vote, here are the opinions of an independent organisation that models itself as an empowering tool for consumers. Not surprisingly its focus is very individualistic, but this doesn't take away from the fact that the arguments shown here have been nearly mute from the mainstream debate.  . . read more
Al Gore Plays With Fire- by Sean Maguire
16 dec  |  His detractors may not agree, but for most people Al Gore and his arguments on why climate change is dangerous and why it should be the top priority of all government decisions has been well reasoned. 

He gave us in An Inconvenient Truth a melee of graphs based on sound scientific data; the affect of which was amazing in bringing the issue of climate change to the homes and cinemas of the middle-classes. 

However in a worrying change of tone, Al Gore stated yesterday in a speech in Copenhagen that:

''Reason based analysis has thus far proved of limited value in motivating action''

Now this may be true but the alternative- to rely on emotion and fear- plays right into the hands of deniers who claim the climate change movement is one built on unlikely doomsday prophecies. 

The risk is also enormous when you consider what has happened to the climategate emails. Those much analysed documents seemed to show a similar reasoning by renowned scientists who were frustrated by inaction so they used their credibility, and reputations to fuzz the numbers. 

Now it may have been a throw away comment, but I really hope that Al Gore- still the climate change movement's most prominent face- stays patient and prudent.  . . read more

Copenhagen and Cynicism-by Sean Maguire
7 dec  |  If the world's initial faith in the Kyoto Protocol can be seen as an anecdote for collective naivety, then the Copenhagen conference will soon exist as a short-hand for cynicism.

Without a single day of talks, the vast majority of pundits have already set the bar of expectations so low that it seems we should be popping the champagne if the most anodyne of political agreements is reached.

Not to fall into the trap of optimism, but shouldn't we be a little bit hopeful and a little bit proud of the victories this fight has already won?

For instance, there cannot be a single sane leader on this planet who can realistically ignore this issue.

Yes, so far most of the world's responses have bordered on the tokenistic, but the sheer awareness and the fear of backlash, is a sign that the movers and shakers are getting scared.

Not to exaggerate but there could also be a dangerous connotation to this wide-spread cynicism-that connotation being that the most modest of successes will cause surprise and a spark of hope amongst a grey and apathetic public.

Sort of takes the heat off government leaders who thought they'd have to thrash it out in debates and eventually return to their countries exhausted, treaty in hand proclaiming that the problem was finally solved.

Instead, with the contour-less global media poised with their fingers quivering over keyboards (and the letters that spell 'failure'), an undue amount of column inches will be written for the promised funds for developing nations, as renewable technolgies are extolled and the great demon coal is exorcised. 

My point?

Well we really have to keep our collective critical thinking cap on, because this about to become a no-holds barred grudge match where everything will be too little, too late, too much, too weak etc.

Just don't be too pessimistic because fatalism never fixed anything.   . . read more

To fail the test of the ETS
27 apr  |  By Sean Maguire

So it turns out that "the greatest moral challenge of our time" might not be our greatest policy priority.

So which "greatest" challenge are we talking about?

Health? Education? Preserving the capitalist world order by using socialist inspired economics?

No, it's climate change! The one time cause of choice for middle-class city dwelling youngens and leftist coffee quaffers.

Now though we've come to our senses and the CPRS (the policy equivalent of the lonely and unloveable fat kid at school) has been thrown onto the backburner until worldwide whisperings become intolerable screams and shouts.

Until that day, take solace in the fact that Rudd- the genius of expedience- will again get to dodge the danger of the hard graft and again Australia will look to the world as a follower.

Ignoring the inevitable and shying away from what the science tells us will save us.  . . read more

Hacker breaks into climate change research institution
23 nov  |  An anonymous hacker has broken into the University of East Anglia's Climate Research Unit (CRU) and posted over 1000 confidential emails from key climate change scientists online.

The emails could prove to be extremely damaging to the reputation of the scientists and the robustness of their research if they are revealed to be authentic.

A UEA spokesman said: "We are aware that information from a server used for research information in one area of the university has been made available on public websites. Because of the volume of this information we cannot currently confirm that all of this material is genuine."

The authors of the emails include Philip Jones, the Director of the CRU, Keith Briffa, also at the CRU, and Michael Mann at the University of Virginia.

An anonymous link to an FTP server where the data was posted by the hacker first appeared on the blog The Air Vent yesterday.

According to Dave Britton, a press officer at the Met Office, the security breach occurred a couple of days ago. "We don't know yet whether the data that was stolen is authentic, but a thorough investigation is underway," he says.

Mann declined to comment on the content of the emails, but added, "However, I will say this: both their theft and, I believe, any reproduction on public web sites, etc. of individuals emails that were obtained, constitutes serious criminal activity. I'm hoping that the perpetrators and their faciliators will be tracked down and prosecuted to the fullest extent the law allows."

Published at New Scientist, click view for more information  . . read more

Who's Talking About Over-Population?
24 sep  |  It's very 1970s to explain the converging catastrophes of climate change, energy depletion and diminishing bio-diversity to be the result of an over-populated planet. If you chastised multiple baby-spawning as a greenhouse gas issue, you'd be raked over the coals and called a Malthusian, racist, or worse. While environmentalists of the 1970s championed the movement toward 'zero population growth' (ZPG), urging middle-class hippies of the day to 'stop at one', today they wouldn't touch the issue with a barge pole. . . read more
Climate conversion on the Camino road
17 nov  |  My conversion moment came while walking along a busy interstate highway in Spain, crowded with trucks that were passing me every second, blowing me off my feet and filling my lungs with their exhaust gases. I knew then that we cannot go on like this- by Tony Kevin . . read more
Open letter to Barnett and Garrett
21 jun  |  Dear Colin Barnett and Peter Garrett,

I urge you to reconsider your position vis-a-vis the controversial proposal to create a Gas Hub at James Price point in the Kimberly, particularly in view of the recent incidents of serious off-shore disasters in the Timor Sea and the American Gulf coast.

I recently watched a snippet on YouTube by local elder and law man Joseph Roe, who is one of the many people opposed to this ill thought-out project that could well cause untold environmental damage to the area, and it brought tears to my eyes.

It seems to me, Mr Barnett, that the thinly veiled threat to compulsorily purchase the land (which I understand belongs to the local Aboriginal people under a "Land Rights" grant) smacks of hypocrisy!

I don't know whether either of you have a family home or estate, going back with several generations of history. If you did, try to imagine how you would feel if your Aboriginal gardener dug up some ancient Nungar bones, and was able to prove it was a sacred site, and was allowed to compulsorily purchase your home (probably for far less than it was worth) and demolish it - and your history into the bargain?

As for you, "Silent" Peter - do you remember a song you were proud to sing with the Oils called "Warakurna"?

Words used like "it's their land, let's give it back" would appear in retrospect to be so much hot air!

C'mon, both of you!

It's time to "Stand up! Stand up and be counted!".

The safety of this pristine environment, and its whale breeding ground has to be worth more than money....? 

Michael Stewart  . . read more

2010: High Hopes for Low temperatures- by Simon Moore
17 jan  |  2010: High Hopes for Low temperatures- by Simon Moore . . read more
blogs   100words
 
by Jack Freeman

As four months of travel in India is coming to an end I am finding
it continually confusing that many of the cultural atrocities that
come with this society of 1 billion strong are deemed "interesting"
and "profound".

Sitting in social circles from hostel to hostel, I have met forceful disagreement with my criticisms of the oppressive nature of India's cast system and their large Islamic community. The smug, "oh, you just don't get it" attitude you receive for owning such opinions is both condescending and misguided.

This is an enraging example of the pseudo, naive belief that this "exotic"society is unintelligible to (most of) us westerners. In this beautiful, richly diverse and all round fun country where, by the same token, you will be greeted by zero empathy of female lib, homosexual equality or my own personal faithlessness, I wish that travelers would not deny their education and morals on arrival. Is it not possible to balance both romance and a sense of rationality?