Like cheese, wine and surrendering, France is famous for it's protests; yesterday though they misfired when they stood against changes to the state's pension law.

With the world's demography dramatically widening at the older end of the spectrum there will have to be vast changes to how we think about welfare, work, and tax the world over- the French though are sticklers for tradition and retiring at 60 is a tradition they want to keep.

Too bad frankly. 

Rising the minimum retirement age from 60 to 62 years old will save the country 70bn euros.  

So for all the old people who have managed to manipulate a keyboard, don't pretend you're not (or won't be) a burden to the rest of us.

Shut up, get back to work and blame your parents for creating your booming generation which should be going out like a whimper- allowing the rest of us to mop up after you.

Ask any kid what they'd do if they were Prime-Minister and the most likely response you'll get is that they would spend more money in areas like education, health, transport etc.

Somehow in the passage of time between playground and politician this wisdom of needing to spend is lost and all sorts of excuses are made not to invest in infrastructure.

To me it should be called inferred-structure; it's inferred (or it should be) that a state needs efficient, sustainable, and easily-accesible public infrastructure to suceed.

Apparently parts of Australia's clunking public transport infrastructure seem to have missed what should be common knowledge and the virus of ignoring inferred-structure also seems to be plaguing vast quantities of the world- including the rust belts of the UK and the US.

But possibly for no longer.

Barack Obama in what could be a defining point of his Presidency has announced a 6 year plan to invest in America's infrastructure to make it world class again.

Rail, roads, runways- the country will get moving again.

A lesson for the rest of the world that should be inferred but might need to be enforced if it isn't learnt quickly.

Obama 'ends' the Iraq war while body bags continue to pile up, Tony Blair weeps for the dead but refuses to apologise, Australians continue to fight in Afghanistan to secure a shaky government while Australia's shaky government fights for relevance.
 
With even our most inspirational politicians failing us, what is the point in having the audacity to hope?

Can we still be stupid enough to believe our problems will be magically solved for us?

And with the world stagnating in war, environmental collapse and economic inequalty has there ever been a better time for anarchy?
 

Sitting in social circles from hostel to hostel, I have met forceful disagreement with my criticisms of the oppressive nature of India's cast system and their large Islamic community. The smug, "oh, you just don't get it" attitude you receive for owning such opinions is both condescending and misguided.

This is an enraging example of the pseudo, naive belief that this "exotic"society is unintelligible to (most of) us westerners. In this beautiful, richly diverse and all round fun country where, by the same token, you will be greeted by zero empathy of female lib, homosexual equality or my own personal faithlessness, I wish that travelers would not deny their education and morals on arrival. Is it not possible to balance both romance and a sense of rationality?

For those who believe in signs maybe the gulf of mexico oil spill was not enough, it appears whoever wishes to send a message seems intent on getting this one through. 

A few hours ago an offshore rig close to the BHP site exploded. Fortunately no one was hurt but maybe this is an indicator of a greater issue. Could it be possible, that we shouldn't be doing this? 

An incredibly dangerous activity that endangers the lives of those who work with it, in addition to slowly assisting the rape of our environment, i cannot see too many positives.

Sure the transition to clean energy would be an annoyance, but whats wrong with starting? Fuck the oil companies, they already have a big enough piece of the pie.

Wealthy environmentalists unite, oh wait... 

I sat drearily in an International Negotiations class today, regretting the decision to switch to a Business major from my former politics stream when suddenly my ears perked up, then grew red with embaressment for my naive teacher. 

She had just vomited out the statement that "Israeli's were excellent integrative negotiators", with another in a line of American presidents urging a new round of peace talks today, talks which neither side has ever made decent progress with, it made her comment look inane and idiotic. If the Israeli's were such great integrative negotiators then surely they would have reached a middle east compromise maybe even a two state solution? 

After this flippant comment it appeared the entertainment was over for the day, but no! "...and Germans are eager to accomodate the needs of all those around them". My german colleague next to me audibly groaned.

Two things can be concluded from this erratic display of acute knowledge, the first being that cultural stereotypes have no place in a business course and the second is that a negotiations professor should probably not become involved in international relations.