Make this my home page
More buttons
Best of the Day
Page
Climate change makes butterflies emerge earlier
Video
Jon Stewart's Spends Half His Show Skewering Glenn Beck
Blog
March 18, 1987: Woodstock for Physicists
Game

Zero Punctuation: Heavy Rain

Art
Tim Burton Next 3D Animated Film? Da Da Da, Da, Snap Snap, `The Addams Family'
Cool tools
Hot links

Super Mario Flash Game Restyled for Obama

Dadaist deconstruction of new media, as a flash game.
Everything you need to know about microscopic water bears
News for nerds
For lovers of the Green Fairy
Stories and art from Australia's Yolgnu people
Australia's best science fiction author
Did the earth just move?
Don't discount journalism
Novelist and comic book legend's homepage
Museum of science fiction, utopia and extraordinary journeys
Developing tech to get the internet to its full potential
Free Culture, Open Government, Liberty
Online Buddhist meditation
Reducing harm from drug use
Power Shift 09

  This weekend the Power Shift conference in Sydney told a message that has been often heard but rarely heeded. A message that says we can, we should, but we aren't doing enough to curb the effects of climate change. This conference aimed to change that; giving already empowered young people the tools to spread the gospel and also get results in the process. Yet, at times the conference was dominated by 'empowering' rhetoric on the power of youth and that this generation is our last and best hope. The language, in my mind, has lost its potency and after every single speaker had said it was getting dull and repetitive. Anyway, onto the conference. - by Sean Maguire

The Participants

What has been interesting about the conference has been both the age of the participants and also where they've come from. Many of them are high-school students from interstate. The ones I met and spoke too seemed well informed and incredibly active in their local communities. Take Emily Pritchard for instance 17, from Melbourne and a member of Change & Switch; an organisation that had sponsored her to come up to Sydney after her involvement in the Model United Nations.

She wasn't your typical activist; she wasn't interested in non-violent direct actions and civil disobedience saying she was more impressed by spreading the message through the Youth Decides campaign (which will be discussed later). Hasindu Saranguhewagetb, 16, was similarly impressed by the idea, both of them saying they would both be taking it back to their schools.

The Politicians

On the first day, the only politician in sight was NSW Premier Nathan Rees, who made the point that all his advisors had told him not to come to the conference. Probably for good reason; his policies to address climate change have been woeful, and as his advisors expected, the crowd was hostile to him from the first moment.

When hecklers started asking questions about the coal industry he simply spoke as if not hearing them. He was fairly unimpressive, but the crowd's reaction was. When he finished his lackluster speech the crowd all stood up, donned green hard hats and shouted NO NEW COAL, RENEWABLE ENERGY NOW. Needless to say, he scampered pretty quickly.

The second day was one where politicians and climate change heavy-weights were much more at the fore; there was South Australian Premier Mike Rann who received a warm reception and wild applause when his government's climate change policies were told to the audience. Yet, when members of the crowd who had turned their backs on him for his government's uranium policy, heckled him, the crowd was definitely in favour of Mr. Rann. It turned nasty when one of the conference goers took it upon himself to eject the hecklers, and shove him around a bit in the process.

And then it turned even nastier, when a Maralinga Woman stood up and started heckling Mr. Rann about nuclear testing done by the British in the 1950s in South Australia. Again, what was interesting was how to crowd was so much in favour of the speaker. As Resistance member and heckler Zane Alcorn told me, it was sad to see how the crowd was so much in favour of listening to the man in the suit rather than the man asking the questions.

A little bit counter-intuitive and not really progressive.

Then there was independent Senator Nick Xenephon, who, like Rann also received loud applause for his climate change work. Finally there was Senator Christine Milne from the Greens, definitely a crowd favourite and for good reason, she spoke eloquently about the problems that we're facing and made it obvious that she would never tire from the fight.

The Policies and the Controveries

Like the Unions or any political party, the conference (and the climate change movement in general) suffered from too many divergent opinions as to how the problem should be tackled.

The most fractured of the discussions was on the CPRS, (the Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme). Senator Christine Milne and Senator Nick Xenephon were clearly opposed to it, arguing it didn't go far enough to address the problems, and that the targets were measly, compared to what was needed. Tim Flannery on the other hand argued that the CPRS should be passed and that:

‘We need to take a first step and we need to take it in advance of the Copenhagen Meeting so we can go there with at least some credibility'

Copenhagen was also another sticking point. At the press conference, Flannery, the chairman of the Copenhagen Climate Conference was strangely doubtful about what Copenhagen could achieve. Echoing Rudd, he kept saying that he was beyond optimism and pessimism and that it was only ‘determination' that could get a meaningful and effective agreement. He then went on to say, that if Copenhagen isn't effective then we (the youth), should have a ‘winning strategy' on hand to push the movement forward.

What or in what form that should be, was never elaborated upon.   

The Next Election and the Youth Decides Campaign

What was an interesting point mentioned by Professor Flannery, Senator Milne and Senator Xenephon was the way in which the next election (or a double disillusionment- fingers crossed) could ultimately dictate how climate change effects this country and the world in general. Flannery said that:

‘We have to see emissions peaking in the developed world in the next 5 years'

This means that the governments that are elected in the next few years will be the one's that write the policies that matter. Christine Milne then went onto to say that in Australia, it will be the balance of power in the Senate that will make a major difference. At the moment it's shared between the Greens, Climate-change skeptic Senator Steve Fielding and indendent, Senator Xenephon. Milne argued that:

‘We [the Greens] are going to be working hard to get the balance of power in our own right'  

The Youth Decides Campaign was another point of interest. Run through World Vision, (although curiously not on their web-site, or on the web anywhere), the campaign moves to create a referendum that young people can log on to and show their support for the Climate Change movement.

Inspiration from the individual

In light of all this, what has been the most inspirational aspect of the conference has been the (slightly older) and more experienced activists. The activists like Louise Morris, campaigner for Friends of the Earth who has worked for over a decade to protect forests, and has recently moved on to tackle the coal industry in Victoria. Or there is Steve Phillips the founder of Newcastle based climate change action group Rising Tides, which is attempting to curb the expansion and eventually the use of coal for power in Australia. Or there is Anna Rose, the Co-Director of the AYCC, and Co-Director of Power Shift. All three (and many many more) seem absolutely tireless in their pursuits. That tireless dedication made it even more macabre when in the workshop on the Story of Coal both Louise Morris and Steve Phillips found it so difficult to come up with success stories from their activism.

What that led me to realise is that these are the people, regardless of whether anyone is with them, or if it's in fashion, they will fight. And that they have and they will always dedicate their lives for the protection of the environment. Something that we can't underestimate or take for granted.

Go back to previous pageLeave some feedbackPrint this pageEmail link to friendsBookmark in del.icio.usAdd to Stumble ThisAdd to your favourite bookmarksDigg this article

Tags

 

Related Stories

   
Next
At a recent lecture given by long time subversive artists Gilbert and George, there was a fantastic point made which highlighted the absurdity of institutionalised religion and the anomalous status it's given in today's society.

They said something along the lines of....

"Imagine if a biscuit company was able to sell itself the way the church does. The biscuit company would probably be able to do a lot better if it was able to offer eternal life (in addition to biscuits) as a reward for your money"

Now the idea also works in reverse.

Imagine if there was a company that didn't pay tax, had little or no oversight from the state legal system, was found to be fingering children- had tried to hide it- their leader and the leader's brother were both implicated and they still refused to open themselves up to public scrutiny.

You probably wouldn't buy their biscuits would you.

Find out about our Widget

Feedback

4 mar

The HomepageDAILY community likes to co-create both content and process. What are you thinking right now about what we do and how we do it? Tell us about the news, videos and stories and anything else you see on HPD. What you like, what you don't like, what you'd like to see in future. Recommend a website, video or article; send us pix, new stories - share it with us and by so doing you are giving us permission to share it with the world.

Leave Feedback here

*********************************

Why has homepage started running so many nameless 100 word eds? Names are good for intellectual continuity, honesty and non-hypocrisy. - Terry McGee

*********************************

Re: Bale de Rua

We thought the Bale de Rua was aweful. Choreography was terrible - set design, music and costumes were lacklustre. The dancers however were very athletic and graceful. - Jules

*********************************

Re: In Praise of Mediocrity

I just wonder who decides if what ever you chose to do in life, is mediocre or not. Sounds like with standards like yours, this article with its poor structure and soap box appeal may also be considered by many as, in-fact, mediocre. - Khedra

*********************************

Re: The Assassins of Langley

Yes, Mr. Neville. Odious, heinous assassins sold body and soul to Luciferian entities who pull the strings (the last of them, I want to believe) from the shadows. Philip Aggeee and John Stockwell portrayed them quite well. They are NOT heroes, nor are the gangbangers of East Los Angeles who spray grafitti in Iraq, where they most certainly train for urban warfare on our streets. Good riddance to them all!

*********************************

Re: Hairy Legs: A Study of Female Art, Feminism and Femininity

 Looking forward to more of her articles. Hope she does plenty of Art Theory at SCA. Barbara Kruger and Judy Chicago are certainly powerful artists and it would be interesting to see what they are doing now.

*********************************

A hero's welcome for the famous Iraqi shoe thrower

Terrorist! Please do your research first before writing such dangerous things, we was insulting Bush by throwing the shoe as he was disgraced with him, not trying to topple the largest super power in the world by throwing a shoe. I cant believe you have put those words up. Ashamed

*********************************

Re: How to Report the News

Having worked as a TV news reporter I found Charlie's piece very amusing - some of us have long believed reporting like this is a rubbish way to do things! But even if a journalist wants to tell stories in a more authentic and engaging way, the constraints of the so-called "house style" in many news organisations make it difficult to achieve. What's needed is a massive culture shift and a complete re-think of what we understand quality broadcast news reporting is. And guess what? That's exactly what's happening, though you'd never believe it from what we're still mostly seeing on TV. Anyway, the new digital technologies, and shake up of "old school/old mainstream" journalism means new platforms and styles of "news" storytelling can now emerge. Let's hope fresh and appropriate ways of funding appear too, so we can kill off this dreadful formulaic reporting and delivery, and clear the way for more natural and interesting ways to treat stories and content.

Much love, Ian Aspin.
www.twitter.com/ianaspin

*********************************

Re: Pushing 60 With Pot

You're pushing 60, well I'm pushing 70 and still having to scrounge around for my pot. It's tragic that when I first came to Australia it was $30 an ounce, and now I have to pay nearly $350 - Peter

 *********************************

Re: Textbook publishers dream of the tablet

Why can't this just be a program for PC and Windows? Why do they have to make us buy more hardware that's just going to disappoint? - Tyler J. Wilson

*********************************

Re: Killing Indian Students: Australia's Favourite New Sport!- by Sean Maguire

How about the indian guy who slashed his wife's throat, is still australia to blame for?..may be , for accenpting them to move over!I am an immigrant myself but I love this country, there is no perfect place on Earth but australia is one of the best! - Michael

*********************************
 
 
This entire fiasco is an incredible over reaction. Australia is an easy target. Why? because we are honest, transperant and we talk about our failings. Is there aggression and iolence in Australia? Sure, like any country. But we face it head on and we work to eliminate it. What about the stories of the 100’s of thousands of Indian workers who are treated as slaves in the middle east and nobody says anything? What about the fact that India still has entrenched pedophilia in terms of child brides? What about the crushing poverty embraced by more than 60% of the Indian people while this nation runs around building nuclear warheads? A storm in a teacup, an over reaction, and a diversion from some the really bad issues facing India. What is really happening here is that students are being unnecessarily frightened. meaning they will miss out on what could be the opportunity of their lifetime. - Daryl
 
*********************************
 
 
I couldn't agree with Sean Maguire's article more on the recent Indian attacks. For all those who like the pretend the attacks are merely based on coincidence, try to imagine how we would react if the boot were on the other foot and an uncharacteristic number of Australia's had been murdered in India. Would you push for a travel ban? Would you be scared for your children in a seemingly hostile environment so many miles away?  - Kara Jensen-Mackinnon

*********************************
 
12 sep
10 aug
More feedback...
© 2007-2008 homePageDAILY - All rights reserved * Terms of Use * Privacy Policy * Advertising Information * Media Kit * Contact Us