Make this my home page
More buttons
Best of the Day
Page
Michelin moves the motor to the tyre
Video
Second Glance
Blog
BME ModBlog - Tattoos, piercing, scarification and body modification
Game
Afro Samurai - Two Headband Trailer
Art
Waterfigures
Cool tools
Hot links
Everything you need to know about microscopic water bears
News for nerds
For lovers of the Green Fairy
Stories and art from Australia's Yolgnu people
Australia's best science fiction author
Did the earth just move?
Don't discount journalism
Novelist and comic book legend's homepage
Searchable history of the internet
Exposing systematic torture in Iran
Museum of science fiction, utopia and extraordinary journeys
The real story of christianity
Image bookmarking
Developing tech to get the internet to its full potential
Free Culture, Open Government, Liberty
Stalin’s Ghost Over Georgia

RENATE OGILVIE gives some historical context to the conflict in Georgia, a crisis that could put heat back into the Cold War.

So this is what happens when a dying superpower and the belligerent amateurs in charge mishandle a conflict that is fast becoming a major world security scare. A flabby wordy stance by Bush initially, then suddenly some rhetoric that is hugely escalating Sakhashvili’s Georgian brinkmanship, and we may have World War III over a territory that is the size of Sydney’s greater West.

As soon as pictures of Russian ‘peacekeepers’ cowering in cellars in South Ossetia after Georgia’s incursion appeared on worldwide TV news, it was clear that Putin would take charge again and give the marching orders to restore Russian pride. Initially, as in a schoolboy brawl both sides claimed it was the other‘s fault, but the truth is that Sakhashvili did not poke the school bully but the local crime boss.

It is unclear whether we are witnessing sabre rattling or the old Soviet method: if in doubt move in a few tanks and occupy the capital. But in either case, Stalin’s ghost is rising over the hills of his Georgian home territory, where as a young swaggering gangster he cut his teeth with murder and mayhem before engaging in full-scale genocide as the Soviet Union’s dictator.

Despite the best efforts of their hero dissidents like Alexander Solzhenitsyn, a lot of Russians still love Stalin, the monster from Tiblissi. No matter that he solved the nationality problem through genocide by starvation, incarceration and mass execution - he defeated Hitler and made the Soviet Union strong.

Putin wants to return to this glory after the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1989, and after the clownish Yeltsin drunkenly reeled through a defective and sickly democracy. Russians don’t relish being pushed around in areas which were their own fiefdoms once - rather like the U.S. attitude towards their ’backyard’ Central America. Also, there is the added bonus of controlling the pipeline that supplies a large amount of gas to Europe. And perhaps the greatest prize: the Georgian sea ports.

Georgia now finds she is paying horrifically for the unforgivable strategy error of her elected leader. Sakhashvili has unleashed a scenario whose dangers should have been obvious to anyone with even the most rudimentary understanding of recent history, let alone Sakhashvili himself whose early years must have been learning Russian in the Soviet education system.

Meanwhile the amateurs in Washington are belatedly waking up to this brand-new conflict which once again is partly their own doing: goading an insanely proud Russia by building aggressive looking defence systems in New European countries like Poland and other once Russian dominated countries, cocking a snoop at Moscow, inviting Georgia, a shaky democracy into NATO without really meaning it. Turning NATO itself from a staunch bulwark during the Cold War into a hugely extended and therefore ineffectual conglomerate, seemingly only to annoy the humiliated Eastern power.

Now Bush is announcing that he is sending humanitarian aid into a completely unstable region, with dire warnings to Russia about the safety of American personnel. If a single American is killed through intent or happenstance, we may see what we thought had become unthinkable: a shooting war between Russia and the West.

One wonders how all this will play out in the American election. Is all this political karma ripening too much for Obama? The next days will show his mettle. The crisis in Georgia is too dangerous for idle party political rhetoric. Real statesmanship is needed, and we will see the shape of things to come, for better or for worse.

Go back to previous pageLeave some feedbackPrint this pageEmail link to friendsBookmark in del.icio.usAdd to Stumble ThisAdd to your favourite bookmarksDigg this article

Tags

 

Related Stories

   
Next
Palestinian - Israeli peace-making can only deliver if Palestinians are united, but the current Annapolis "peace process" was launched first of all as a blueprint for perpetuating the inter- Palestinian divide.

Commitment or non-commitment to what the Quartet of the US, EU, UN and Russian mediators in Middle East peace - making described as the "Annapolis Process" in a statement they released after their meeting in the Egyptian Red Sea resort of Sharm el-Sheikh on November 8 has become the terms of reference to make or break the Palestinian unity of ranks, which has so far failed the Egyptian mediation efforts, the latest in a series of national, Arab and non-Arab similar reconciliation endeavors.

The Annapolis conference, which was hosted by the United States in Meryland on November 27, 2007 and attended by all members of the League of Arab States, convened with much fanfare and re-launched the Palestinian - Israeli negotiations after a seven - year interruption since the collapse of the trilateral Camp David summit with the U.S. in 2000.

In Annapolis, Arab leaders and the Palestinian presidency were lured by a promise of a Palestinian state by the end of 2008 and a wider Arab - Israeli peace process, mainly on the Syrian track thereafter, to coexist with the inter-Palestinian divide between the PLO - led West Bank and the Hamas - led Gaza Strip and to grudgingly hide their bitter resentment of the U.S. - Israeli threat of siege, which had aborted Qatari, UAE, Saudi, Egyptian, Yemeni and other Arab and non - Arab mediation efforts to unify Palestinian ranks.

The Annapolis plan to implement the first stage of the 2003 Road Map for a Palestinian - Israeli political settlement has built on two pillars, the first a Palestinian - Israeli security coordination that is solely and directly monitored by three senior U.S. generals, namely James Jones, William Fraser and Keith Dayton, and the second pillar is inter - Palestinian divide between the PLO in Ramallah and Hamas in Gaza.

However, the failure of the "Annapolis process" could be better proved by the unmet deadline of 2008 and the un-honored promise of a Palestinian state, but the two pillars nonetheless survived the failure of Annapolis so far to perpetuate and exacerbate the Palestinian rift, with the security coordination raising accusations by Hamas of PLO collaboration with Israel and the divide developing into what threatens to become a permanent separation between the West Bank and Gaza.

There remain too at the core of the Annapolis process and at the heart of the Palestinian divide the three Israeli - U.S. "good conduct" preconditions that qualify Palestinians to be partners to peace negotiations as well as to evade military siege, economic blockade and diplomatic isolation, namely to unilaterally renounce violence without any guarantees of Israeli reciprocity, recognize the existence of the state of Israel without any Israeli reciprocal recognition of the state of Palestine, and commitment to the accords signed by the PLO with Israel regardless of Israeli reciprocal respect thereto.

Israel's lack of reciprocity has come recently under spotlight by the refusal of the U.S. State Department to publish a report by its Middle East security envoy General James Jones on Palestinian - Israeli security, which the Israeli newspaper Haaretz, quoted by AFP on November 26, described in August as "an extremely critical report of Israel's policies" in the West Bank and Gaza Strip."

It is now public knowledge that the Palestinian partner to the Annapolis process, represented by the President Mahmoud Abbas - led Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) and the autonomous Palestinian Authority (PA), are wholeheartedly committed thereto irrespective of any Israeli reciprocity. The emergency meeting of the Arab foreign ministers in Cairo on November 26 concluded similarly committal, encouraged beforehand to let go the undelivered promises of the Annapolis conference by indications floated by both the Israeli President Shimon Peres and the U.S. President - elect Barak Obama's team of their willingness to deal with the collective Arab peace initiative.

Hamas is consequently left in the cold to fend off a Palestinian and Arab diplomatic isolation as much as to survive the Israeli ongoing economic blockade and military siege, "hopefully" to gradually be finished off or alternatively to surrender to those same three preconditions to which its Palestinian rival had subscribed to as early as the Oslo accord was signed with Israel in Washington D.C. in 1993.

More out of presuming the weakness of Hamas than out of feeling a strength in his own position, but stiffening his back with the U.S. and Israeli determination to push hard with their three pre-qualifications, President Abbas feels safe enough to persistently reiterate his commitment to Annapolis and to corner the besieged Islamic movement to either dismantle voluntarily or otherwise being swept away in a way or another, and he is on record as saying that the end of the "black coup d'etat" in Gaza in June 2007 is only a matter of time.

However the end game of the Annapolis process is still far away from being the only game in the town as it is held hostage to Hamas' fate as much as it has cornered Hamas, but meanwhile this process remains the detrimental factor that makes or breaks the unity of Palestinian ranks, as long as both Palestinian protagonists continue to risk it out in their brinkmanship policies.

Nicola Nasser is a veteran Arab journalist in Kuwait, Jordan, UAE and Palestine. He is based in Ramallah, West Bank of the Israeli-occupied Palestinian territories.