Make this my home page
More buttons
Best of the Day
Page
'Credit card theft? There's an app for that'
Video
Adam Savage Builds His Own 'Blade Runner' Blaster
Blog
Vote One Zero Zero against climate inaction- by Tony Kevin
Game
Final Fantasy, Then and Now
Art
VIV Mag Featurette: A Digital Magazine Motion Cover and Feature for the iPad
Cool tools
Hot links

Super Mario Flash Game Restyled for Obama

Dadaist deconstruction of new media, as a flash game.
Everything you need to know about microscopic water bears
News for nerds
For lovers of the Green Fairy
Stories and art from Australia's Yolgnu people
Australia's best science fiction author
Did the earth just move?
Don't discount journalism
Novelist and comic book legend's homepage
Museum of science fiction, utopia and extraordinary journeys
Developing tech to get the internet to its full potential
Free Culture, Open Government, Liberty
Online Buddhist meditation
Reducing harm from drug use
Atheists More Intelligent Than Believers

Richard Dawkins argued in his recent book The God Delusion that it is not intelligent to believe in the existence of God. Academics RICHARD LYNN, JOHN HARVEY & HELMUTH NYBORG decided to look at the evidence for this contention - whether there is a negative relationship between intelligence and religious belief.

Their research tells us there is a negative relationship in the U.S. and Europe, and in a sample of 137 countries the correlation between national IQ and disbelief in God is significant.

Intelligence and Religious Belief Within Nations

We are by no means the first to suggest the existence of a negative relationship between intelligence and religious belief within nations. This phenomenon was observed in the 1920s and the 1950s by researchers who concluded that "intelligent students are much less likely to accept orthodox beliefs, and rather less likely to have pro-religious attitudes". Evidence comes from four sources:

(1) Negative correlations between intelligence and religious belief.

A recent review of the research literature looked at 43 studies, of which all but four found a negative correlation. In a more recent study in the United States, kids were asked  "To what extent are you a religious person?" The responses were coded "not religious at all", "slightly religious", "moderately religious", and "very religious". The results showed that the "not religious at all" group had the highest average IQ (103.09), followed in descending order by the other three groups (IQs = 99.34, 98.28, 97.14).

(2) Lower percentages holding religious beliefs among intelligence elites compared with the general population.

In the 1990s a study of members of the American National Academy of Sciences reported that 7% believed in the existence of God, as compared with approximately 90% found in a poll of the general population. In Britain, it has been reported that 3.3% of Fellows of the Royal Society believed in the existence of God, while 78.8% did not believe. At the same time a poll showed that 68.5% of the general population believed in the existence of God.

(3) Decline of religious belief with age among children and adolescents.

Also consistent with the negative correlation between intelligence and religious belief is the decline in religious belief during adolescence and into adulthood as cognitive ability increases.

This has been found in the United States for the age range of 12-18 year olds. Among 12 year olds 94% endorsed the statement "I believe there is a God", while among 18 year olds this had fallen to 78%. Similarly, in England, a decline in religious belief over the age range 5-16 years has been revealed.

(4) Decline of religious belief during the course of the twentieth century as the intelligence of the population has increased.

There is evidence for a decline of religious belief during the course of the last 150 or so years, while at the same time the intelligence of the population has increased. The decline of religious belief has been shown by statistics for church attendance and for belief in God recorded in opinion polls. For instance, in England self reported weekly attendance at church services in census returns, declined from 40% of the population in 1850, to 35% in 1900, to 20% in 1950, to 10% in 1990.

In the United States, students at Bryn Mawr were asked whether they believed in a God who answered prayers. Positive responses were given by 42% of students in 1894, 31% in 1933, and 19% in 1968. Students enrolling at the University of Michigan were invited to provide a "religious preference". In 1896, 86% of students did so; in 1930 this had dropped to 70%, and in 1968 it had dropped to 44%.

Intelligence and Religious Belief Between Nations

To investigate the relationship between intelligence and religious belief between nations we have taken the IQs of nations given in Lynn and Vanhanen's (2006) IQ and Global Inequality.

The data for the national IQs and percentages asserting disbelief in god for the 137 countries show that in only 17% of the countries (23 out of 137) does the proportion of the population who disbelieve in god rise above 20%. These are virtually all the higher IQ countries. 

The hypothesis with which we began this study was that there is a negative correlation between IQ and religious belief. We have reviewed considerable evidence for this negative relationship among individuals in the United States and Europe and have added a new data set confirming this. We have extended this hypothesis to an examination of whether a negative correlation between IQ and religious belief is present between countries. Using data from 137 countries we found a correlation of 0.60 between national IQs and disbelief in god. So we conclude that the negative correlation between IQ and religious belief that has been found in numerous studies within nations is also present between nations.

This conclusion raises the question of why should there be this negative correlation between IQ and belief in god. Many rationalists no doubt accept the argument advanced by Frazer in The Golden Bough that as civilisations developed "the keener minds came to reject the religious theory of nature as inadequate ... religion, regarded as an explanation of nature, is replaced by science" (by "keener minds" Frazer presumably meant the more intelligent).

Others have assumed implicitly or explicitly that more intelligent people are more prone to question irrational or unprovable religious dogmas. For instance, some sixty years ago Kuhlen and Arnold proposed that "greater intellectual maturity might be expected to increase scepticism in matters of religion". Inglehart and Welzel suggest that in the pre-industrial world, humans have little control over nature, so "they seek to compensate their lack of physical control by appealing to the metaphysical powers that seem to control the world: worship is seen as a way to influence one's fate, and it is easier to accept one's helplessness if one knows the outcome is in the hands of an omnipotent being whose benevolence can be won by following rigid and predictable rules of contact...one reason for the decline in traditional religious beliefs in industrial societies is that an increasing sense of technological control over nature diminishes the need for reliance on supernatural powers". 

There are a few exceptions to the generally linear relationship between IQ and disbelief in god across nations. Two of the most anomalous are Cuba and Vietnam, which have higher percentages disbelieving in god (40% and 81%, respectively) than would be expected from their IQs of 85 and 94 (respectively). This is likely attributable to these being former or current communist countries in which there has been strong atheistic propaganda against religious belief. In addition, it has sometimes been suggested that communism is itself a form of religion in which Das Capital is the sacred text, Lenin was the Messiah who came to bring heaven on earth, while Stalin, Mao, Castro and others have been his disciples who have came to spread the message in various countries. On these grounds, it may be argued that many of the peoples of Cuba and Vietnam hold a variant of more conventional religious belief in god.

The United States is anomalous in having an unusually low percentage of its population disbelieving in God (10.5%) for a high IQ country. The percentage disbelieving in God in the United States is much lower than in north west and central Europe (e.g. Belgium, 43%; Netherlands, 42%; Denmark, 48%; France, 44%; UK, 41.5%). One factor that could provide a possible explanation for this is that many Americans are Catholics, and the percentage of believers in Catholic countries in Europe is generally much higher than in Protestant countries (e.g. Italy, 6%; Ireland, 5%; Poland, 3%; Portugal, 4%; Spain, 15%). Another possible contribution to this has been continued high immigration of those holding religious beliefs.  A further possible factor might be that a number of emigrants from Europe went to the United States because of their strong religious beliefs, so it may be that these beliefs have been transmitted as a cultural and even genetic legacy to subsequent generations.

Further Reading

Argyle, M. (1958). Religious Behaviour. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.  

Argyle, M. and Beit-Hallahmi, B. (1975). The Social Psychology of Religion. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Beit-Hallahmi, B. and Argyle, M. (1997). The Psychology of Religious
Belief and Experience
, London, Routledge.

Bell, P. (2002). Would you believe it? Mensa Magazine, Feb., 12-13.

Dawkins, R. (2006). The God Delusion.  London: Bantam Press.

Francis, L.J. (1989). Measuring attitudes towards Christianity during childhood and adolescence. Personality & Individual Differences, 10, 695-698.

Frazer, J. G. (1922). The Golden Bough. London: Macmillan.

Giddens, A. (1997). Sociology. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

Gilliland, A.R. (1940). The attitude of college students towards God and church. Journal of Social Psychology, 11, 11-18. 

Goldman, R.J. (1965). Do we want our children taught about God? New Society, 27 May.

Heath, D.H. (1969). Secularization and maturity of religious belief. Journal of Religion and Health, 8, 335-358.

Hoge, D.R. (1974). Commitment on Campus: Changes in Religion and Values over Five Decades. Philadelphia: Westminster Press.

Howells, T.H. (1928). A comparative study of those who accept as against those who reject religious authority. University of Iowa Studies of Character, 2, No.3.

Inglehart, R. and Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).

Kanazawa, S. (2007). De gustibus est disputandum 11: why liberals and atheists are more intelligent. (Unpublished).

Kuhlen, R.G. & Arnold, M. (1944). Age differences in religious beliefs and problems during adolescence. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 65, 291-300.

Koenig, L.B., McGrue, M., Krueger, R.F. and Bouchard, T.J. (2005). Genetic and environmental influences on religiousness: Findings for retrospective and current religiousness ratings. Journal of Personality, 73, 471-488.

Larsen, E.L. and Witham, L. (1998).  Leading scientists still reject God. Nature, 394, 313.

Leuba, J.A. (1921). The Belief in God and Immortality. Chicago: Open Court Publishers. 

Newcomb, T.M. and Svehla, G. (1937). Intra-family relationships in attitude. Sociometry, 1, 180-205.

Rindermann, H. (2007). The g-factor of international cognitive ability comparisons: The homogeneity of results in PISA, TIMMS, PIRLS and IQ-tests across nations. European Journal of Personality, 21, 667-706.

Roe, A. (1965). The Psychology of Occupations. New York: Wiley.

Sinclair, R.D. (1928). A comparative study of those who report the experience of the divine presence with those who do not. University of Iowa Studies of Character, 2, No.3.

Turner, E.B. (1980). General cognitive ability and religious attitudes in two school systems.  British Journal of Religious Education, 2, 136-141.

Verhage, F. (1964). Intelligence and religious persuasion. Nederlands tijdschrift voor de psychologie en haar grensgebieden, 19, 247-54. 

Zuckerman, P. (2007). Atheism: Contemporary Numbers and Patterns. In M. Martin (Ed) The Cambridge Companion to Atheism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Go back to previous pageLeave some feedbackPrint this pageEmail link to friendsBookmark in del.icio.usAdd to Stumble ThisAdd to your favourite bookmarksDigg this article

Tags

 

Related Stories

   
Next
With two States waiting weeks for election results, the political culture of Australia seems decidedly messy and confused.

In Tasmania, a large vocal minority of Greens will have the balance of power in a hung parliament, there will be infighting and bickering until the Liberal Opposition claims a minor majority and thrusts forward its impotent Premier into the melee.

In South Australia, Rann will win, but his bravado and virility will be curbed as his ability to nonchalantly wave around his policy penis becomes hampered.

What all this seems to show is that Labor is slipping, the Greens and the environment movement are gaining a lot of traction and Australia is divided.

Hopefully not to the point where Red and Blue States form which look at each other with systemic suspicion, but it does seem that these divides are becoming increasingly irreconcilable.  

Bet Labor wishes they could turn back the clock two years when they controlled every government at State and Federal level and do things a bit differently.

Find out about our Widget

Feedback

4 mar

The HomepageDAILY community likes to co-create both content and process. What are you thinking right now about what we do and how we do it? Tell us about the news, videos and stories and anything else you see on HPD. What you like, what you don't like, what you'd like to see in future. Recommend a website, video or article; send us pix, new stories - share it with us and by so doing you are giving us permission to share it with the world.

Leave Feedback here

*********************************

Why has homepage started running so many nameless 100 word eds? Names are good for intellectual continuity, honesty and non-hypocrisy. - Terry McGee

*********************************

Re: Bale de Rua

We thought the Bale de Rua was aweful. Choreography was terrible - set design, music and costumes were lacklustre. The dancers however were very athletic and graceful. - Jules

*********************************

Re: In Praise of Mediocrity

I just wonder who decides if what ever you chose to do in life, is mediocre or not. Sounds like with standards like yours, this article with its poor structure and soap box appeal may also be considered by many as, in-fact, mediocre. - Khedra

*********************************

Re: The Assassins of Langley

Yes, Mr. Neville. Odious, heinous assassins sold body and soul to Luciferian entities who pull the strings (the last of them, I want to believe) from the shadows. Philip Aggeee and John Stockwell portrayed them quite well. They are NOT heroes, nor are the gangbangers of East Los Angeles who spray grafitti in Iraq, where they most certainly train for urban warfare on our streets. Good riddance to them all!

*********************************

Re: Hairy Legs: A Study of Female Art, Feminism and Femininity

 Looking forward to more of her articles. Hope she does plenty of Art Theory at SCA. Barbara Kruger and Judy Chicago are certainly powerful artists and it would be interesting to see what they are doing now.

*********************************

A hero's welcome for the famous Iraqi shoe thrower

Terrorist! Please do your research first before writing such dangerous things, we was insulting Bush by throwing the shoe as he was disgraced with him, not trying to topple the largest super power in the world by throwing a shoe. I cant believe you have put those words up. Ashamed

*********************************

Re: How to Report the News

Having worked as a TV news reporter I found Charlie's piece very amusing - some of us have long believed reporting like this is a rubbish way to do things! But even if a journalist wants to tell stories in a more authentic and engaging way, the constraints of the so-called "house style" in many news organisations make it difficult to achieve. What's needed is a massive culture shift and a complete re-think of what we understand quality broadcast news reporting is. And guess what? That's exactly what's happening, though you'd never believe it from what we're still mostly seeing on TV. Anyway, the new digital technologies, and shake up of "old school/old mainstream" journalism means new platforms and styles of "news" storytelling can now emerge. Let's hope fresh and appropriate ways of funding appear too, so we can kill off this dreadful formulaic reporting and delivery, and clear the way for more natural and interesting ways to treat stories and content.

Much love, Ian Aspin.
www.twitter.com/ianaspin

*********************************

Re: Pushing 60 With Pot

You're pushing 60, well I'm pushing 70 and still having to scrounge around for my pot. It's tragic that when I first came to Australia it was $30 an ounce, and now I have to pay nearly $350 - Peter

 *********************************

Re: Textbook publishers dream of the tablet

Why can't this just be a program for PC and Windows? Why do they have to make us buy more hardware that's just going to disappoint? - Tyler J. Wilson

*********************************

Re: Killing Indian Students: Australia's Favourite New Sport!- by Sean Maguire

How about the indian guy who slashed his wife's throat, is still australia to blame for?..may be , for accenpting them to move over!I am an immigrant myself but I love this country, there is no perfect place on Earth but australia is one of the best! - Michael

*********************************
 
 
This entire fiasco is an incredible over reaction. Australia is an easy target. Why? because we are honest, transperant and we talk about our failings. Is there aggression and iolence in Australia? Sure, like any country. But we face it head on and we work to eliminate it. What about the stories of the 100’s of thousands of Indian workers who are treated as slaves in the middle east and nobody says anything? What about the fact that India still has entrenched pedophilia in terms of child brides? What about the crushing poverty embraced by more than 60% of the Indian people while this nation runs around building nuclear warheads? A storm in a teacup, an over reaction, and a diversion from some the really bad issues facing India. What is really happening here is that students are being unnecessarily frightened. meaning they will miss out on what could be the opportunity of their lifetime. - Daryl
 
*********************************
 
 
I couldn't agree with Sean Maguire's article more on the recent Indian attacks. For all those who like the pretend the attacks are merely based on coincidence, try to imagine how we would react if the boot were on the other foot and an uncharacteristic number of Australia's had been murdered in India. Would you push for a travel ban? Would you be scared for your children in a seemingly hostile environment so many miles away?  - Kara Jensen-Mackinnon

*********************************
 
12 sep
10 aug
More feedback...
© 2007-2008 homePageDAILY - All rights reserved * Terms of Use * Privacy Policy * Advertising Information * Media Kit * Contact Us