The art of assessing conversation
page
Who Is Copyright Designed For?
page
Adam Yauch was a Muslim hero
page
Diablo 3 - The Basics
page
Woody Guthrie comes to Salford
page
Radiohead's Thom Yorke: 'I can see why 'The King Of Limbs' alienated people'
Washington Comes to Mr Smith

With U.S. Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice being feted on her flying visit to Australia, RICHARD NEVILLE asks why are politicians such cowards in the face of cruelty and war crimes?

When Condoleezza Rice landed in Australia, she was treated like a fairy godmother. Australia's Foreign Affairs Minister, Stephen Smith, took her off to meet his mum, his dad and his children, this urbane superstar from Washington, who remains proud of her role in trashing Iraq. (Over 1.2 million deaths plus 4.7 million Iraqis displaced from their homes). The highlight of Condi's stopover, according to media reports, was her hour long visit to a high school attended by Mr Smith's 14 year old daughter, Maddie, "where enthralled students quizzed her about everything from shopping habits to holiday plans..."

No-one mentioned the wars. The Times of India headlined her ‘wardrobe malfunction' which revealed a "little bit more than she intended, courtesy of her flesh-coloured blouse". Asked about her ideal holiday, Condi waxed lyrical about a house in the mountains with a piano, herself playing Brahms. No-one asked her about torture or renditions. If they had, she would have denied it, as she did to the world in September 2006: "The United States does not transport, and has not transported, detainees from one country to another for the purpose of interrogation using torture". Sure, and torture doesn't happen at Guantanamo Bay, a facility she enthusiastically supports.
 
So why did the likeable Mr Smith grovel so? Why did the media focus on trivia, on Condi's language skills, her fitness program and her "attractiveness", at a time that the crimes of the Bush administration are finally receiving wider attention? There is one dispiriting explanation, to which I'll later return. Condi was cheered by 450 schoolgirls and treated to a choral rendition of - wait for it - What a Wonderful World. "My favourite song" noted Condi, without irony, adjusting her blouse. "There is no better friend to the United States than Australia".  Right now, probably the only friend.
 
Meanwhile, the subject of U.S. torture, renditions and war crimes is being raised in unexpected quarters. The latest House of Commons Human Rights annual report states that the UK can "no longer rely on U.S. assurances that it does not use torture, and we recommend that the Government does not rely on such assurances in the future". Condoleezza's own  bald faced lie on this subject, quoted above, is featured in the British report as a prime example of an unreliable assertion.

Even more of a surprise than the UK Government's burst of candour, was David Letterman's recent TV musings with Jane Mayer, author of The Dark Side, that Bush & Co "were not good people". The meandering conversation concluded that the "Bush administration is clearly guilty of war crimes". Mainstream at last! Until a year ago, said Letterman, he used to think such suggestions were "wacky"... or "funny" to which Mayer replied: "I don't think they're laughing about it in the White House". Certainly not Condoleezza, now back in the Devil's lair, far from a besotted Australian foreign minister and worshipful choir girls.
 
In the face of cruelty and war crimes, why are our politicians such cowards? And why do so many media commentators continue to insist that George Bush's America is a beacon of freedom? Part of the answer can be summed up in one word: duchessing, a process by which opinion leaders and politicians from friendly nations are flown to the U.S., to be deeply wined and dined and flattered; to be accommodated in 5 star hotels and treated to briefings with members of Congress and A-list celebrities. A friend of mine was duchessed years ago, and still hasn't recovered. He was asked to submit a dream U.S. travel itinerary and a list of people he yearned to meet, and it all came true. He was flown to Aspen, Niagra Falls, San Francisco; he met the President, he dined with film stars, he paid for nothing, not even the call girls. I asked, "Did it change you?". Oh yes, he said.
 
I think of this friend every time I see bright columnists write rubbish about the humanity of precision bombing, the genius of Wall Street, the need to pacify Afghanistan. I think of this friend every time I hear politicians proclaim the importance of an iron clad alliance with America "at all costs", including that of our soul. It is why this weekend in Australia, as impeachment proceedings commenced against George Bush and the global voices of dissent gathered steam, all we got on the Condoleezza visit down under was hot air, a flimsy blouse and a choir of angels.

Photo above: U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice with Australian Foreign Minister Stephen Smith, his wife Jane, and their son Hugo and Mr Smith's parents Les and Florence.

Share |
blog comments powered by Disqus

Tags

 

Related Articles

Losing Trust in Bush
28 jul  |  Former White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan discusses how his disillusionment towards the Iraq war affected his relationship with former friend President George W. Bush. . . read more
The Strange Success of the Surge - From Patrick Cockburn
3 aug  |  The ability of America to make unilateral decisions in Iraq is diminishing by the month, but the White House was still horrified to hear the Iraqi prime minister Nouri al-Maliki appearing to endorse Barack Obama’s plan for the withdrawal of American combat troops over 16 months. This cut the ground from under the feet of John McCain who has repeatedly declared that ‘victory’ is at last within America’s grasp because of the great achievements of ‘the Surge’, the American reinforcements sent to Iraq in 2007 to regain control of Baghdad.

The success of ‘the Surge’ is becoming almost received wisdom in the U.S. This is strange since, if the U.S. strategy did win such an important victory, why do America generals need more soldiers, currently 147,000 of them, in Iraq than they did before ‘the Surge’ started? But belief in this so-called victory is in keeping with the American tradition of seeing everything that happens in Iraq as being the result of actions by the U.S. alone. The complex political landscape of Iraq is ignored.

U.S. commentators have never quite taken on board that there are not one but three wars being fought out in the country since 2003: the first is the war of resistance against the American occupation by insurgents from the Sunni Arab community. The second is the battle between the Sunni and Shia communities as to who should rule the Iraqi state in succession to Saddam Hussein. The third conflict is a proxy war between the U.S. and Iran to decide who should be the predominant foreign power in Iraq. The real, though exaggerated, fall in violence in Iraq over the last year is a consequence of developments in all three of these wars, but they do not necessarily have much to do with ‘the Surge’. [More] . . read more

It's the Surge, Stupid
28 jul  |  If you want to be John McCain's vice presidential nominee, you better start talking up the success of the Iraq 'surge'. And if you're serious it wouldn't be a bad idea to say McCain invented the surge idea and maybe even coined the word. . . read more
Condoleezza Snow Jobs the ABC - From 'The Alchemist'
6 sep  |  According to its transcript of last night's interview with the Wicked Witch of the West, the ABC's Lateline discussion "focused on the war in Iraq". Like hell. What it focused on was a series of delusional fantasies. Everything was swell, said Rice, "actual Iraqis" were getting the hang of how to run their country and kill "terrorists". Australia's role was valiant. John Howard and George Bush had built an alliance "in the trenches". Vomiting yet?

Interviewer Leigh Sales managed to remind Rice that acts of terrorism had soared since the U.S. invasion, but Spin Queen didn't miss a beat. "It shows that we are actually pursuing them for the first time and they are fighting back". By this logic the White House will have won the war, once the terrorists have blown up the whole world.

Sales did not ask Rice how she felt about the consequences of the invasion, about the million dead Iraqis, the millions of refugees, the wrecking of Baghdad, the brutality of the occupiers. No mention of a resistance. Everything bad in the world, according to Rice, is created by terrorists, whose mission is to "bomb and murder innocent people for their own ideological purposes". A mission best left to the U.S. air force.  . . read more

The Elephant in the Room - From Dave Lindorff
19 jun  |  On Monday last week, something important happened in Washington. Rep. Dennis Kucinich, the Democratic representative from Cleveland, who early in the primary season won some of the biggest applause lines in the Democratic presidential candidate debates, introduced 35 articles calling for the impeachment of President George W. Bush for high crimes and misdemeanors.

You'd be excused if you didn't know this happened. There was almost no reporting on the event that day or the next... A week later, it has still not been reported in the New York Times, the nation’s self-described “newspaper of record,” even though the Times had just days before Rep. Kucinich’s action, editorialized about the enormity of the president’s lies in tricking the country into invading Iraq — one of the crimes leading Kucinich’s long list....

The unwillingness of the nation’s news media to seriously consider the need for Congress to respond to and challenge the president’s clear abuses of power—even as they themselves condemn of those abuses of power—is a blot on the journalistic profession perhaps worse, and of more lasting consequence, than their failure to act as watchdogs and critics during the run-up to the Iraq War, when they acted more as patriotic cheerleaders than as news organizations. [More] . . read more

A Totally Lawless Regime - From Paul Craig Roberts
22 jun  |  Think about this question: In the 21st century what regime is more lawless than the Bush Regime? Everyone is entitled to his own answer. The only answer I can come up with is the Zimbabwe regime of Robert Mugabe. Voted out of power in the last election, the great man hasn’t left. Zimbabweans are going to have to vote again, and the great man has said that any vote that is not for him will be cancelled by a bullet...

It is now an incontrovertible fact, known all over the world, that George W. Bush and his regime lied through their teeth in order to launch wars of aggression against Afghanistan and Iraq, and that the Bush regime is doing the same thing again in hopes of launching an attack on Iran.

As a consequence of Bush’s lies, there are a million dead Iraqis, mostly women and children, and four million displaced Iraqis, 4,100 dead American soldiers and tens of thousands of seriously wounded. No one knows how many dead in Afghanistan. And there is the ongoing Israeli slaughter of Palestinians and Lebanese that has fallen under the rubric of the “war on terror.” The only ones pleased with these wars are the American neoconservatives, the Israeli right-wing, the U.S. corporate military-security complex, and Osama bin Laden...

Reelecting Republicans means the end of the United States as a land of liberty. [More]

Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan administration. . . read more

Why Impeaching Bush is Important
24 jan  |  While neither Hillary Clinton nor Barack Obama are currently pushing for the impeachment of President Bush and Vice-President Cheney, Democrat congressman Robert Wexler continues to fight for an impeachment in Congress. . . read more
Lara Logan on Daily Show
26 jun  |  Lara Logan, chief foreign correspondant for American CBS News, appears on the Daily Show with Jon Stewart and has some harsh words about the state of the U.S. media and its lack of Iraq war coverage. . . read more
Buying the War
11 sep  |  Part of American journalist Bill Moyers' special on how the mainstream media helped promote the Bush administration's war in Iraq. How did the mainstream press get it so wrong? How did the evidence disputing the existence of weapons of mass destruction and the link between Saddam Hussein to 9/11 continue to go largely unreported?

Buying the War examines the press coverage in the lead-up to the war as evidence of a paradigm shift in the role of journalists in democracy and asks, over four years after the Iraq invasion, what's changed? . . read more

blogs   100words
student
student
 
Ron Paul on Why Bankster Power Must be Eradicated
It is imperative that the American people be educated on the dangers of the Fed and the importance of restoring sound money. Now that nearly 50 years have elapsed since silver was removed from circulation, fewer and fewer Americans have firsthand familiarity with real money.

The laying of the groundwork must begin today, so that the American people will be prepared for the day when the mirage the Fed has created evaporates completely.