Make this my home page
More buttons
Best of the Day
Page

Ecuador Repudiates Foreign Debt

Video

Hot For Words: Lollipop

Blog
Innocent Spam
Game
EA SPORTS Complex on PlayStation Home
Art
Kinetic sculpture is a cross between art and engineering.
Cool tools
Hot links
Dadaist deconstruction of new media, as a flash game.
Everything you need to know about microscopic water bears
News for nerds
For lovers of the Green Fairy
Stories and art from Australia's Yolgnu people
Australia's best science fiction author
Did the earth just move?
Don't discount journalism
Novelist and comic book legend's homepage
Searchable history of the internet
Exposing systematic torture in Iran
Museum of science fiction, utopia and extraordinary journeys
The real story of christianity
Image bookmarking
Developing tech to get the internet to its full potential
Arrogance and Atrocities in Afghanistan

The sixth Australian soldier has just died in Afghanistan but RICHARD NEVILLE believes that Afghan cilivian casualties are being ignored, victims of U.S. military tactics that could constitute war crimes.

Special forces soldier Sean McCarthy has died from injuries sustained in Afghanistan and I extend my deepest sympathy to his family and friends. This is the sixth Australian military death reported since Australia threw itself into the 2001 invasion of that unhappy land, in which over 1500 civilians have died and countless more maimed. Defence chief Angus Houston says that Australian forces will now "harden their resolve to go after Taliban bombmakers", but the biggest bombmakers and bomb droppers by far are the U.S. Military.
 
For seven years Coalition forces have been pouring fire and brimstone onto the mud brick compounds of Afghani families. In July 2002, snug in their AC-130 bombers, American pilots wiped out a wedding party in Uruzgan province, killing 48 civilians - mostly women and children - and injuring 117 locals. Their excuse? Sounds of gunfire below. But Afghan Government officials and witnesses said the only gunfire from the area came from wedding guests who fired their rifles in celebration. The U.S. maintained it acted "properly and in accordance with the rules". Whose rules?
 
For pilots and CIA torturers, the invasion is a ball. An average of 40 air strikes a day on an enemy without an airforce - how good is that?
Depleted uranium? You got it.
Cluster bombs? Let ‘em rain.
Murder for the hell of it? See the movie.
Consequences? Zilch.

The Australia presence in Afghanistan makes us complicit in such crimes. But of course, as with Iraq, we have trained ourselves to look the other way. So here we are six years later, almost to the month, and what have we learned? That the U.S. military still can't tell the difference between a Taliban cell and wedding party. On July 16/08, the BBC reported that "at least" 20 people had been killed in a missile strike by U.S. helicopters in Nangarhar province, 19 of them women and children. According to RAWA, the Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan, the bride and two of her female relatives were among the victims. Why can't the Pentagon learn from its mistakes? Maybe the 4th of July pumps up testosterone (two days before the wedding attack,15 civilians died in a missile strike).

In response to the tragic death of Sean McCarthy, Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd said the mission in Afghanistan was "difficult, dangerous and bloody", but he didn't remind us what the mission was. Could it be that he too has forgotten? Yes, the Taliban are vicious, life denying thugs, like the juntas in Burma, Zimbabwe, Uzbekistan, etc, but we aren't crashing their weddings. What do the Afghan locals think?
 
RAWA has been struggling for human rights and social justice since the 1970's. They say that outing the Taliban and plonking the warlords in power merely "replaced one fundamentalist regime with another" and for them "freedom and democracy can't be donated; it is the duty of the people of a country to fight and achieve these values". But like all the invaders before us, we claim to know better.

Go back to previous pageLeave some feedbackPrint this pageEmail link to friendsBookmark in del.icio.usAdd to Stumble ThisAdd to your favourite bookmarksDigg this article

Tags

 

Related Stories

   
Next
It looks like Johnny Howard's been teaching Daubya about "Mateship" and the lesson has sunk in as the former Aussie PM has been booked into the Blair House, a high security guesthouse across the road from the White House from the 12th in order to be on hand to recieve the Presidential Medal of Freedom, to be presented to Howard on January 19.

The Blair House is tradidionally used by the President-Elect in the lead up to the inauguration and the Obamas has asked to be moved into the Blair House earlier so their two young children could start at their new school on the first day of the new term but have since been booked into the Presidential Suite at the Hay-Adams Hotel.

Comments from various blogs have not been complimentary:

"What would possess Howard to not at least publicly offer up his stay at Blair House to Obama. Then Obama could graciously say no thank you. By keeping his reservation and being silent Howard showed himself to be not that bright of a person and one can understand how he would pal around with george in an illegal war or two.
It would not be above george to threaten Howard with not giving him the medal if he didn't stay at Blair House and it would not be below Howard to respond to the threat in the way that he did, sort of like a cowering dog. The Aussies must really be proud of their guy. Any body got a shoe."
- Conrad C. Elledge

"George couldn't make this idiot stay at the hay-adams?" - Joe"no doubt Howard is receiving the honor for driving his country's currency into the abyss." - Urbuhlship

"Ah...the administration that live and died by the belief that loyalty trumped competence, clarity and every other imaginable factor-hands out a last few favors to the brown nose gang of three.
With the former prime minister of Australia getting the nod to stay in the Blair House-instead of making way for the incoming President.
How fitting. G'day-as they say-down under."
- Don Duval

"Handing out medals by the dozens to his supporters is about the only thing this president seems capable of actually doing. What is the cost to the U.S. taxpayers to bring these guys to Washington so ding-dong in chief can hang a goofy medal around their necks, or pin them on their jackets, or whatever one does with them? At least the national medal budget will likely be significantly reduced after January 20th." - Bill