Obama's Moral Cowardice
Robert Manne on asylum seekers and the Left's failure
The perils of holding the balance of power
Metroid: Other M
As it Happens
WWII Vet Talks about the Power of Music
The Raw Story
Breaking plans of a U.S. attack on Iran.

The Raw News is a great source of news that doesn't get touched in the mainstream - this does not mean it's wild, crazy and conspiracy-laden, just not as concerned with keeping corporate and political masters and partners happy.

There is extensive archives as well as breaking news and The Raw News also gets some great exclusives such as the current lead story which reveals that the U.S. is preparing a 'massive' military attack against Iran.

The evidence comes from the paper, "Considering a war with Iran: A discussion paper on WMD in the Middle East" – written by well-respected British scholar and arms expert Dr. Dan Plesch, Director of the Centre for International Studies and Diplomacy of the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) at the University of London, and Martin Butcher, a former Director of the British American Security Information Council (BASIC) and former adviser to the Foreign Affairs Committee of the European Parliament – and exclusively provided to Raw Story.

The analysis in the study says that the United States has the capacity for and may be prepared to launch without warning a massive assault on Iranian uranium enrichment facilities, as well as government buildings and infrastructure, using long-range bombers and missiles.

The study concludes that the U.S. has made military preparations to destroy Iran’s WMD, nuclear energy, regime, armed forces, state apparatus and economic infrastructure within days if not hours of President George W. Bush giving the order. The U.S. is not publicising the scale of these preparations to deter Iran, tending to make confrontation more likely. The U.S. retains the option of avoiding war, but using its forces as part of an overall strategy of shaping Iran’s actions.

To real the full exclusive at The Raw Story click View button below.

Comments

Please log in to leave a comment.
You need to have been a member for 24 hours and validated your email before leaving a comment.
 
How #iranelection became the place to see the Twitter revolution
18 jun  |  The fact that the likes of Facebook and Twitter, are playing a vital role in communicating dissent in the aftermath of the Iranian presidential election should not be surprising. Despite the western world seeing Iran as something of a closed society, the second language of blogging on the web is Farsi, with some reports suggesting that there are 700,000 bloggers in that language.

This is a computer-literate society, and as the BBC reported this morning on the Today programme, the demographics of those who have taken their dissent out on the streets who how to make their voice heard on the web too. Among the keenest protesters are well-educated and westernised young people who have active on the internet for years now.

What the web has provided is a means to provide near real-time and unfiltered information to pour out of Iran. Twitter in particular has been a focus for those want the absolute latest news. After an initial fight amongst users about what Twitter feed people should follow for the latest on Iran, most are now using the #iranelection tag to send in their tweets.

Some have clearly being using the micro-blogging service to try and organise protests. “After yesterday million-large protests, continue your peaceful protests today in Tehran at Valiasr Street 5pm TELL EVERYONE,” wrote one Twitter user this morning.

Initially, reports from Tehran straight after the election suggested the authorities had tried to interfere or had disabled access to some sites, like Twitter and Facebook, and even blocked SMS text messages, a preferred medium of communication amongst young Iranian. Reporters Without Borders said that ten or so pro-opposition websites were censored in the aftermath of the election results being announced. Under such conditions, Iranian hackers reportedly help to keep channels to access the web open and even took down Mr. Ahmadinejad's website in an act of sabotage.

In this context, it is easier to understand some of the debates that are raging on social media sites. Some Twitter users complained that the #iranelection feed was being watched, filtered and censored by the Iranian regime. As that rumour began to spread, others said this was a deliberate misinformation trying to make people wary about using Twitter.

Despite all of this, the #iranelection feed has been amongst the most popular Twitter feed for the past days. Seeing this unprecedented surge of interest, Twitter announced yesterday that it will change the times that it would take down the site for maintenance. Twitter moved the downtime to the middle of the night Iran time, with founder Biz Stone explaining that they were recognising “the role Twitter is currently playing as an important communication tool in Iran.”

The revolution may not be televised in Iran, but it may well be tweeted.

[via Times Online]  . . read more

TV News Hiding Truth About Iraq Civil War
20 aug  |  Eric Margolis, contributor to American Conservative magazine and The Real News, says television news is misleading people about the responsibility of the U.S. in fueling the Iraq civil war. . . read more
Gordon Brown: Wiring a web for global good
28 jul  |  We're at a unique moment in history, says UK Prime Minister Gordon Brown: we can use today's interconnectedness to develop our shared global ethic -- and work together to confront the challenges of poverty, security, climate change and the economy. . . read more
TomDispatch
15 jul  |  A regular antidote to the mainstream media. . . read more
The Internet and the Future of News
15 apr  |  Columnist, author and Professor of Journalism Eric Alterman speculates on the future of newspapers, in a conversation with FORA.tv founder and CEO Brian Gruber.  . . read more
Washington Comes to Mr Smith
27 jul  |  With U.S. Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice being feted on her flying visit to Australia, RICHARD NEVILLE asks why are politicians such cowards in the face of cruelty and war crimes? . . read more
William Kristol's Highlight Reel
3 jan  |  William 'Bill' Kristol is one of the most influential neo-conservatives and war-mongers in the USA. Here's a highlight reel of some of his talking head moments. . . read more
Dana Priest on Backlash from Uncovering CIA Secret Prisons
30 apr  |  Washington Post journalist Dana Priest describes death threats and backlash she received after reporting on the CIA's use of secret prisons to detain terrorism suspects.  . . read more
blogs   100words
 
By Sean Maguire

Obama 'ends' the Iraq war while body bags continue to pile up, Tony Blair weeps for the dead but refuses to apologise, Australians continue to fight in Afghanistan to secure a shaky government while Australia's shaky government fights for relevance.
 
With even our most inspirational politicians failing us, what is the point in having the audacity to hope?

Can we still be stupid enough to believe our problems will be magically solved for us?

And with the world stagnating in war, environmental collapse and economic inequalty has there ever been a better time for anarchy?