Students at the University of Sheffield have donated four tonnes of goods to city charities. As...
Why Recent Graduates Should Join Code for America
Sympathy for the dodgy salesmen of Australian politics
Babel Rising
T.C. Boyle: Incorporating Environmentalism in Art
The Stone Roses confirm all planned shows to go ahead after Ian Brown calls Reni a 'c**t' onstage
Right Wing Militias and the NRA: Second Amendment Soulmates
Right Wing Militias and the NRA: Second Amendment Soulmates

By Dennis A. Henigan

In America, the threat of terrorism is real, but it does not originate with Al Qaeda alone. The danger of homegrown right wing political violence is just as real.

This week's Time magazine cover story on "The Secret World of Extreme Militias" sounds an alarm that cannot be ignored. The threat of terrorism is real, but it does not originate with Al Qaeda alone. The danger of homegrown right wing political violence is just as real.

The Time article describes, in chilling terms, the proliferation of heavily armed, right wing militias engaged in paramilitary training to resist the perceived "tyranny" of government authority. Time notes that although the groups and individuals of the violent right reflect a "complex web" of ideologies, "among the most common convictions is that the Second Amendment -- the right to keep and bear arms -- is the Constitution's cornerstone, because only a well-armed populace can enforce its rights." For the militias and their ideological soulmates, "any form of gun regulation, therefore, is a sure sign of intent to crush other freedoms."

The connection between the gun control issue and the threat of violence from the right is an important, but largely untold, story. The militias' view that the Second Amendment protects our other rights, by ensuring the potential for armed insurrection against the government, is indistinguishable from the long-held constitutional ideology of the National Rifle Association.

For decades, NRA leaders have insisted that the Second Amendment is not only about duck hunting or self-defense against criminal attack. Rather, as one NRA official so colorfully put it, "the Second Amendment . . . is literally a loaded gun in the hands of the people held to the heads of government." NRA Executive Director Wayne LaPierre received loud cheers when he told last year's Conservative Political Action Conference that our rights as Americans mean little unless we are ready to defend them against the government by force of arms: "Freedom is nothing but dust in the wind till it's guarded by the blue steel and dry powder of a free and armed people . . . . Our founding fathers understood that the guys with the guns make the rules."

The Time reporter asked one Ohio militia officer what government action the militia is defending against. He replied, "Most likely it will start when the government tries to take our guns." Of course, the NRA stands alone in its ability to inspire hysterical fears of gun confiscation. During the last Presidential campaign, the NRA maintained a www.gunbanobama.com website and its delusional rhetoric about the Administration's supposed gun-banning intentions has been unrelenting. Looking forward to the upcoming elections, LaPierre seeks to rally the NRA troops by warning of "dark clouds on the horizon," with Democrats "lying in the weeds in wait to pick their time to destroy this freedom."

The determination of NRA leaders to generate paranoia and hatred toward the government has gotten them into trouble before. In a now-infamous fundraising letter sent on April 13, 1995, LaPierre warned his members about the "jack-booted government thugs" of the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, who have the "power to take away our Constitutional rights, break in our doors, seize our guns, destroy our property, and even injure or kill us . . . ." Six days later, as NRA members found this noxious letter in their mail, Timothy McVeigh, convinced that the time to resist federal tyranny had arrived, bombed the federal building in Oklahoma City that housed the local offices of the ATF.

The Time article quotes a "self-described colonel" in a Kentucky militia, who channels LaPierre's incendiary rhetoric by predicting war with "the jackbooted thugs of Washington." LaPierre has made a career of spreading the nonsense that the "jackbooted thugs" are always "lying in the weeds" waiting for the chance to take away everyone's guns. It also is revealing that Richard Mack, one of the sheriffs recruited years ago by the NRA to challenge the Brady Bill in court, is now a hero of the violent right. In an interview with the Time reporter, Mack referred to federal agents as "America's gestapo".

What is truly disturbing is that the political influence of the NRA has given its insurrectionist view of the Second Amendment a home in some very high places, particularly within the Republican Party. It's not just Tea Party Republicans like Nevada Senatorial candidate Sharron Angle, with her call for "Second Amendment remedies," to be used "when our government becomes tyrannical." As the Republican Party has become more and more ideologically "pure" in its support of NRA policy positions, insurrectionist talk has made some surprising appearances.

Originally published at the Huffington Post, click the link to read more or for more information.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Will We Heed President Obama's Call for a More Empathic Society?
14 jan  |  Will We Heed President Obama's Call for a More Empathic Society? . . read more
Student Sues University For Right To Bear Arms On Campus
3 feb  |  The lunacy of the Second Amendment is something that is tearing the U.S apart and making the world think that the country must be mentally deficient. Here we see lunacy at its most ridiculous when students feel they need to pack heat on campus. Incredible.  . . read more
Niall Ferguson: Will Debt Trigger US Collapse?
21 sep  |  Niall Ferguson: Will Debt Trigger US Collapse?  . . read more
War on whistleblower: CIA spies on WikiLeaks for 'Pentagon murder cover-up' exposure?
27 mar  |  War on whistleblower: CIA spies on WikiLeaks for 'Pentagon murder cover-up' exposure? . . read more
U.S in Libya: Get shot by your own bullets
22 mar  |  By Sean Maguire

There are few people in this world who would defend Gaddafi as a sane and viable leader of Libya; but I think there would be even less that would see the logic in the U.S selling guns to someone as psychotic as him and then parading about as world police.

It's the equivalent of a sheriff giving an outlaw a six-shooter and then acting surprised when he starts popping off the town folk. 

The second one U.S plane gets shot down by one U.S surface-to-air missile, all the military big wigs should get together and make a decision once and for all - "we have to stop shooting at tyrants we've given guns to".

What do you think about Libya? What do you think about the obvious contradictions in U.S foreign policy and how do you think they should be addressed? Tell us and remember...Disqus!  . . read more

The Slipping State of the Union- by Sean Maguire
29 jan  |  For the past few years a large number of US experts have begun chiming its death knell as world hegemon.

It's popular to say that as China, India and the rest of the world grow in political and economic strength that the relative superiority of Uncle Sam will wane- giving it less power to mould the institutions that govern the world.

In Barack Obama's State of the Union address there was cause to suggest that maybe his language shows that shift. At one point he talked about infrastructure asking:

"Why should China and Europe have the fastest trains?"

And then when talking about the bigger problems of US politics:

"Meanwhile China isn't waiting to revamp its economy. Germany isn't waiting. India isn't waiting. There nations aren't standing still."

It might be a small point, but where's the Reagan-esque, America is number one and always will be?

And for the rest of the world, is this the beginning of the US finally realising that there is something rotten in the state of their union? . . read more

U.S. Leading The Terror In Afghanistan
13 aug  |  U.S. Leading The Terror In Afghanistan . . read more
Something you can bank on- by Sean Maguire
22 jan  |  It was hilarious.

Almost exactly a year ago- as the global financial crisis was at its most threatening- a friend and I went to a talk at the Adam Smith Institute.

The main speaker- a very forgettable Conservative MP- extoled the value of the free market and market liberalisation while most sensible pundits and politicians were dipping into socialist economics for capitalism's salvation.

After the talk we stayed around to drink champagne, eat canapes and talk to some girls but we were interrupted by some cartoonish toffs.

They (and then the director of the institute) continued the discussion about the virtues of the free market, with the director almost pleading with us to believe that this was a credit crisis and not a failing of his beloved theory. 

Looking at Obama's banking reforms, it seems Mr Free Market is looking even more the fool.

Obama has sought to separate investment and commercial banks, and is trying to strip 'too big to fail' from the corporate lexicon. 

It seems in the land where the free market was the closest to conquering sense, that sense has finally hit back. 

And hopefully is set to stay.   . . read more

blogs   100words
 
"Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it." -- Ronald Reagan (1986)